Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,910 Year: 4,167/9,624 Month: 1,038/974 Week: 365/286 Day: 8/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   George W. Bush's qualifications to be President
ThingsChange
Member (Idle past 5956 days)
Posts: 315
From: Houston, Tejas (Mexican Colony)
Joined: 02-04-2004


Message 174 of 247 (139065)
09-02-2004 1:23 AM
Reply to: Message 171 by crashfrog
09-01-2004 11:40 PM


Fair thee well
crashfrog writes:
It's just their (the wealthy's) fair share, after all
It has nothing to do with "fair". It's "power". It's the people's power to stick it to them as much as they can take (and the people don't feel too guilty), and the wealthy's power to try to hold on. There is no absolute on what is fair in this case. In one respect, "fair" is equal percent of income, and as you suggest, another interpretation could be "burden" on standard of living. That is a socialistic interpretation, but in that view, I guess that is "fair". In any case, I don't think it's fair to use the term fair.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 171 by crashfrog, posted 09-01-2004 11:40 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 175 by crashfrog, posted 09-02-2004 1:35 AM ThingsChange has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024