Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,916 Year: 4,173/9,624 Month: 1,044/974 Week: 3/368 Day: 3/11 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   George W. Bush's qualifications to be President
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 120 of 247 (138286)
08-30-2004 9:32 PM
Reply to: Message 119 by jar
08-30-2004 9:28 PM


Yes it is time for another practice session for whatever
Yes, whatever, since not supporting assertions or apologizing for making them is not in the spirit of the guidelines I'd suggest you back up or retract. Thank you for avoiding a suspension.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 119 by jar, posted 08-30-2004 9:28 PM jar has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 121 by johnfolton, posted 08-30-2004 10:08 PM AdminNosy has not replied

AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 125 of 247 (138344)
08-31-2004 2:12 AM
Reply to: Message 124 by johnfolton
08-31-2004 1:49 AM


Doubling up
Sorry that both the Queen and I are on you at once but you have a long, bad, history of making up things to assert and being unable to support them.
This one you will support or formally withdraw.
Those are all very interesting quotes but no one, that I've noticed, has suggested that TJ wasn't a deist (at least). Therefore it isn't surprising that there are references to God and such. That does support the idea that he might have made a statment such as you've said. However, it doesn't do more than suggest. Others have shown a number of things that also suggest TJ would say no such thing.
You made a very specific statment and you have to support it or withdraw it.
As I have time I'm feeling that you could use a little more of this. You will, when asked, support your assertions. I suggest that you figure out what support you have before you make them.
The overall theme of you posts are nothing but made up twaddle. You've had plenty of time to glean some idea of how to debate in good faith. Now start doing so.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 124 by johnfolton, posted 08-31-2004 1:49 AM johnfolton has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 126 by johnfolton, posted 08-31-2004 2:49 AM AdminNosy has replied

AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 127 of 247 (138349)
08-31-2004 2:53 AM
Reply to: Message 126 by johnfolton
08-31-2004 2:49 AM


read more slowly
Ned, I'm pleased you agree that TJ doesn't sound like a Deist,
I didn't say any such thing. I don't care right now.
Defend or withdraw your statment. You other choice is a suspension.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 126 by johnfolton, posted 08-31-2004 2:49 AM johnfolton has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 128 by johnfolton, posted 08-31-2004 4:13 AM AdminNosy has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024