Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Obama supports Ground Zero mosque. Religious freedom or is he being too PC?
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 445 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 301 of 406 (579002)
09-03-2010 10:12 AM
Reply to: Message 299 by Huntard
09-03-2010 10:09 AM


Re: If you have nothing to hide, you don't need rights.
"Huntard" writes:
Do you really think that any investigation is going to shut the nutters up?
Good point. Some people are going to hate no matter what. But it might shut matters up enough to get it out of the news, and convince people who aren't sure what is going on to the truth. It will also expose those haters. Isn't that a good thing?
Should we just continue letting the haters hate? Like everyone who hates me here, and has framed me to be saying something I am not?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 299 by Huntard, posted 09-03-2010 10:09 AM Huntard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 303 by Huntard, posted 09-03-2010 10:19 AM riVeRraT has not replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 445 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 302 of 406 (579003)
09-03-2010 10:16 AM
Reply to: Message 293 by jar
09-03-2010 9:30 AM


Re: Opening date of the Mosque
"jar" writes:
If you think we are at War, then we have already lost.
I don't think we are at war, I know it. What I don't know is, who exactly is our enemy. What uniform does he wear? Where does he live?
If you think safety is worth destroying the Constitution then we have already lost.
Very true.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 293 by jar, posted 09-03-2010 9:30 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 304 by jar, posted 09-03-2010 10:25 AM riVeRraT has not replied

Huntard
Member (Idle past 2324 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 303 of 406 (579004)
09-03-2010 10:19 AM
Reply to: Message 301 by riVeRraT
09-03-2010 10:12 AM


Re: If you have nothing to hide, you don't need rights.
riVeRraT writes:
Good point. Some people are going to hate no matter what. But it might shut matters up enough to get it out of the news, and convince people who aren't sure what is going on to the truth.
Fair enough.
It will also expose those haters. Isn't that a good thing?
Certainly.
Should we just continue letting the haters hate? Like everyone who hates me here, and has framed me to be saying something I am not?
Of course not, but we already know they are haters that will say anything to slander the other party, they've done so every time before this one. The only thing that an investigation will accomplish is that it is shown once again what kind of dishonest douchebags these people are. Until they accuse the next thing of some slanderous shit. People need to learn that these idiots will say and do anything, and everytime they do, should just shrug and go "ah well, nutters are everywhere".

This message is a reply to:
 Message 301 by riVeRraT, posted 09-03-2010 10:12 AM riVeRraT has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 423 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


(1)
Message 304 of 406 (579006)
09-03-2010 10:25 AM
Reply to: Message 302 by riVeRraT
09-03-2010 10:16 AM


Who is the enemy?
I don't think we are at war, I know it. What I don't know is, who exactly is our enemy. What uniform does he wear? Where does he live?
Well, based on that I'd say that the enemy is the average US Citizen.
Edited by jar, : fix sub-titles

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 302 by riVeRraT, posted 09-03-2010 10:16 AM riVeRraT has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 305 by Coyote, posted 09-03-2010 11:31 AM jar has replied

Coyote
Member (Idle past 2135 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 305 of 406 (579022)
09-03-2010 11:31 AM
Reply to: Message 304 by jar
09-03-2010 10:25 AM


Re: Who is the enemy?
Who is the enemy? This guy, for one:
AMSTERDAM (Reuters) — A well-known Australian Muslim cleric has called for the beheading of Dutch anti-Islamic politician Geert Wilders, a newspaper said on Friday. ... Source

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 304 by jar, posted 09-03-2010 10:25 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 307 by jar, posted 09-03-2010 11:45 AM Coyote has replied
 Message 318 by Rrhain, posted 09-04-2010 4:45 AM Coyote has not replied

hooah212002
Member (Idle past 831 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 306 of 406 (579026)
09-03-2010 11:44 AM
Reply to: Message 296 by riVeRraT
09-03-2010 9:50 AM


Re: Listen
All of those passages, which are from the christian bible, instruct followers to kill non-believers. Maybe you should read the book.

Your god believes in Unicorns

This message is a reply to:
 Message 296 by riVeRraT, posted 09-03-2010 9:50 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 332 by riVeRraT, posted 09-07-2010 6:58 AM hooah212002 has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 423 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 307 of 406 (579027)
09-03-2010 11:45 AM
Reply to: Message 305 by Coyote
09-03-2010 11:31 AM


Re: Who is the enemy?
I'm sorry but exactly how is that person "The Enemy"?

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 305 by Coyote, posted 09-03-2010 11:31 AM Coyote has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 308 by Coyote, posted 09-03-2010 11:47 AM jar has replied

Coyote
Member (Idle past 2135 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 308 of 406 (579029)
09-03-2010 11:47 AM
Reply to: Message 307 by jar
09-03-2010 11:45 AM


Re: Who is the enemy?
I'm sorry but exactly how is that person "The Enemy"?
Take a wild guess. Really stretch your imagination and see if you can come up with some reason.

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 307 by jar, posted 09-03-2010 11:45 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 309 by jar, posted 09-03-2010 11:51 AM Coyote has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 423 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 309 of 406 (579030)
09-03-2010 11:51 AM
Reply to: Message 308 by Coyote
09-03-2010 11:47 AM


Re: Who is the enemy?
Well, I can't. Sorry Charlie.
The guy may well be a bad person, may well be someone that the Dutch or even the Australian authorities might want to watch, but he is certainly no threat to the US.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 308 by Coyote, posted 09-03-2010 11:47 AM Coyote has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 310 by Rahvin, posted 09-03-2010 12:19 PM jar has replied

Rahvin
Member
Posts: 4046
Joined: 07-01-2005
Member Rating: 7.6


Message 310 of 406 (579040)
09-03-2010 12:19 PM
Reply to: Message 309 by jar
09-03-2010 11:51 AM


Re: Who is the enemy?
Well, I can't. Sorry Charlie.
The guy may well be a bad person, may well be someone that the Dutch or even the Australian authorities might want to watch, but he is certainly no threat to the US.
I dunno, I'd say that anyone who actively calls for the beheading (or other form of murder) of another human being is an enemy of civilized society in general.
That said, it's far too easy to point at some violence-inciting Muslim cleric and say "that's the enemy," and completely ignore equivalent or worse threats elsewhere. For all that people call this a "war," the global reaction to international terrorism is nothing whatsoever like wars of the past. Iraq is not the enemy. Afghanistan is not the enemy. Saudi Arabia is not the enemy. We could bomb cities all day long and never "win."
The biggest mistake made since 9/11 has been the mentality that the "war on terrorism" is about killing the "enemy." It's not. You cannot and will not stop terrorism that way. The real war is the battle to hold onto our cherished principles and way of life in the face of minor but extremely frightening attacks - and of course I say minor because in any objective analysis, driving is more of a threat to the United States than international terrorism, as you'd need a 9/11 event almost daily to cost the same number of lives as those lost each year in car wrecks. The difference between international terrorism and obesity is that terrorism has a lower body count, but is far more scary. And in the war against our own fear, the struggle to retain our freedoms and promote freedom and tolerance throughout the world...well, we're losing, because collectively we're cowards without the courage to take a tiny amount of risk for the sake of what we say we value most.
So while I'd certainly say that Mr.-behead-that-government-official is an enemy, the real enemy is our fear of the next attack, the irrational fear that causes us to take irrational action.
After all...we killed far more people in Iraq and Afghanistan than any number of terrorists could ever do. We destroyed more infrastructure than any terrorist has ever managed to interrupt. Our response to international terrorism has been not only to strike back at terrorists, but to strike out at anyone who makes us even think about terrorists. And in doing so, we've not only created more of what we call the "enemy," we've also steadily lost battle after battle in the war to retain our values.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 309 by jar, posted 09-03-2010 11:51 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 311 by jar, posted 09-03-2010 12:44 PM Rahvin has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 423 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 311 of 406 (579047)
09-03-2010 12:44 PM
Reply to: Message 310 by Rahvin
09-03-2010 12:19 PM


Re: Who is the enemy?
See Message 304.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 310 by Rahvin, posted 09-03-2010 12:19 PM Rahvin has not replied

Rrhain
Member
Posts: 6351
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Joined: 05-03-2003


Message 312 of 406 (579293)
09-04-2010 3:41 AM
Reply to: Message 286 by Coyote
09-03-2010 1:10 AM


Coyote writes:
quote:
It might help if fewer Muslims were issuing fatwas and vowing to destroy the Great Satan
Exactly how many do you think do this? And why is it you seem to ignore it when the Christians do it?
quote:
video of folks dancing in the street when the trade towers went down didn't help.
You do realize that the video you saw wasn't actually what it was claimed to be, yes?
And why didn't you complain when Christians did it? They're still doing it. They just went to court in Kansas to keep doing it...and won.
quote:
And don't forget the violent riots around the world because of the cartoons depicting their prophet.
As already pointed out...what makes you think those were "riots"? After all, most of the people who died were killed at the hands of the police. It would seem that the biggest problem was the watchers.
And why is it when the Christians do it, you don't call them riots?
quote:
If Muslims truly are not aggressive towards non-Muslims, and a religion of peace, perhaps they should start acting like it sometime???
When you start having some perspective and treat Christians the same way you treat phantom Muslims, then your proclamations about what Muslims "ought" to do might have some validity.

Rrhain

Thank you for your submission to Science. Your paper was reviewed by a jury of seventh graders so that they could look for balance and to allow them to make up their own minds. We are sorry to say that they found your paper "bogus," specifically describing the section on the laboratory work "boring." We regret that we will be unable to publish your work at this time.

Minds are like parachutes. Just because you've lost yours doesn't mean you can use mine.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 286 by Coyote, posted 09-03-2010 1:10 AM Coyote has not replied

Rrhain
Member
Posts: 6351
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Joined: 05-03-2003


Message 313 of 406 (579295)
09-04-2010 3:45 AM
Reply to: Message 290 by Huntard
09-03-2010 5:31 AM


Huntard writes:
quote:
I don't know, why do some muslims want to be?
So Taz is a terrorist?
Because that's what you're saying.

Rrhain

Thank you for your submission to Science. Your paper was reviewed by a jury of seventh graders so that they could look for balance and to allow them to make up their own minds. We are sorry to say that they found your paper "bogus," specifically describing the section on the laboratory work "boring." We regret that we will be unable to publish your work at this time.

Minds are like parachutes. Just because you've lost yours doesn't mean you can use mine.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 290 by Huntard, posted 09-03-2010 5:31 AM Huntard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 333 by Huntard, posted 09-07-2010 7:09 AM Rrhain has not replied

Rrhain
Member
Posts: 6351
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Joined: 05-03-2003


Message 314 of 406 (579296)
09-04-2010 3:49 AM
Reply to: Message 292 by Huntard
09-03-2010 7:08 AM


Huntard writes:
quote:
Well, those idiots would be them then.
Same question to you as to onifre:
Who are "they"?
It's so easy to be against "them" when you don't know who "they" are.

Rrhain

Thank you for your submission to Science. Your paper was reviewed by a jury of seventh graders so that they could look for balance and to allow them to make up their own minds. We are sorry to say that they found your paper "bogus," specifically describing the section on the laboratory work "boring." We regret that we will be unable to publish your work at this time.

Minds are like parachutes. Just because you've lost yours doesn't mean you can use mine.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 292 by Huntard, posted 09-03-2010 7:08 AM Huntard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 335 by Huntard, posted 09-07-2010 7:12 AM Rrhain has not replied

Rrhain
Member
Posts: 6351
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Joined: 05-03-2003


Message 315 of 406 (579298)
09-04-2010 4:06 AM
Reply to: Message 297 by riVeRraT
09-03-2010 9:56 AM


riVeRraT responds to me:
quote:
I am not having a panic attack.
Did you or did you not say in Message 273:
You are sacrificing our safety, and our freedom just to dis-agree with me. That is what it seems. I agree that there is plenty of hate groups in America (as I pointed out already) and it is well within their right to do so. But we are at war jar. And when you are at war, you don't let the enemy set up camp in your fucking house.
We should have let the Germans build their first jets back in WW2 here, because there is the constitution..... Hitler could have gave is speeches on the white house lawn too.
"Sacrificing our safety"? Just what do you think is going to happen if two Muslims are allowed to get together?
quote:
I heard that fox supported it, I did not know it was monetary.
The #2 shareholder in News Corp (you know...Fox) is putting up the money. Why don't you know this? Did you bother to do any homework before jumping in?
quote:
I agree, Christians are dangerous.
If you agree, why are you only singling out the Muslims? You'll have your hands full trying to keep up with the Christian crazies.
quote:
And I am not paranoid.
You mean you didn't write Message 273?
quote:
I am just stating facts.
What "fact" have you ever stated?
quote:
But there is a reason. That is what I am saying. Haven't you been reading what I said?
Yes. And you haven't given any reason other than paranoia.
quote:
There is something going on
Really? What? What, exactly, is going on?
Be specific.
quote:
and the people who are wrong, need to be found out.
And who are these "people" you're willing to shred the Constitution for? It's so easy to be against "them" when you don't have to actually come up with any real people for "them" to be.
quote:
Either the Muslims are wrong, or the people accusing them are wrong. They both need to be investigated, and this stupidity put to rest.
Why does anybody need to be investigated? Just because you can't keep from hyperventilating?
quote:
It is not right that people can falsely accuse the Muslims like they are, right?
People are free to be foolish.
Why do you think the government needs to be involved?

Rrhain

Thank you for your submission to Science. Your paper was reviewed by a jury of seventh graders so that they could look for balance and to allow them to make up their own minds. We are sorry to say that they found your paper "bogus," specifically describing the section on the laboratory work "boring." We regret that we will be unable to publish your work at this time.

Minds are like parachutes. Just because you've lost yours doesn't mean you can use mine.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 297 by riVeRraT, posted 09-03-2010 9:56 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 334 by riVeRraT, posted 09-07-2010 7:10 AM Rrhain has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024