Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,469 Year: 3,726/9,624 Month: 597/974 Week: 210/276 Day: 50/34 Hour: 1/5


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Obama supports Ground Zero mosque. Religious freedom or is he being too PC?
Rrhain
Member
Posts: 6351
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Joined: 05-03-2003


Message 331 of 406 (579681)
09-05-2010 3:52 PM
Reply to: Message 325 by onifre
09-04-2010 11:00 PM


onifre responds to me:
quote:
Would you consider reciting antisemitic messages on Egyptian TV offensive?
What does this have to do with anything? Are they in the US? Were they the ones who wrote into Comedy Central?
Once again, you leap to vague, unnamed, undefined people. Who are the specific people you're referring to?

Rrhain

Thank you for your submission to Science. Your paper was reviewed by a jury of seventh graders so that they could look for balance and to allow them to make up their own minds. We are sorry to say that they found your paper "bogus," specifically describing the section on the laboratory work "boring." We regret that we will be unable to publish your work at this time.

Minds are like parachutes. Just because you've lost yours doesn't mean you can use mine.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 325 by onifre, posted 09-04-2010 11:00 PM onifre has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 348 by onifre, posted 09-07-2010 11:10 AM Rrhain has replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 438 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 332 of 406 (579980)
09-07-2010 6:58 AM
Reply to: Message 306 by hooah212002
09-03-2010 11:44 AM


Re: Listen
"hooah212002" writes:
All of those passages, which are from the christian bible, instruct followers to kill non-believers. Maybe you should read the book.
Which has nothing to do with today, or with what Jesus taught us to do. It is OT, similar to the barbaric ways of other religions that still practice those kinds of ideas. It's a shame we need to point this out to you. Modern Christians do not follow the practices of the OT. Jesus was the completion of the law. Maybe you should read the book, this time with an open mind.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 306 by hooah212002, posted 09-03-2010 11:44 AM hooah212002 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 340 by frako, posted 09-07-2010 7:43 AM riVeRraT has not replied
 Message 345 by hooah212002, posted 09-07-2010 8:45 AM riVeRraT has replied

Huntard
Member (Idle past 2317 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 333 of 406 (579981)
09-07-2010 7:09 AM
Reply to: Message 313 by Rrhain
09-04-2010 3:45 AM


Rrhain writes:
So Taz is a terrorist?
Because that's what you're saying.
Hmm? How so? My point was about being an asshole and offensive, not about being a terrorist. Would you care to explain how you think I was referring to terrorism?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 313 by Rrhain, posted 09-04-2010 3:45 AM Rrhain has not replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 438 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 334 of 406 (579982)
09-07-2010 7:10 AM
Reply to: Message 315 by Rrhain
09-04-2010 4:06 AM


As usual Rhain, you fly off the handle and are completely illogical.
"Rhain" writes:
"Sacrificing our safety"? Just what do you think is going to happen if two Muslims are allowed to get together?
Um, one hyphenated word:
Al-Farooq
Yes. And you haven't given any reason other than paranoia.
It's not my idea to investigate them, and I am sure they are being investigated. If people start accusing others of things, then an investigation needs to be done, plain and simple. It has nothing to do with paranoia on my part, or racism, or anything else, it is just common sense, and the usual way things are done. It is unfortunate that people get investigated from empty accusations, but sometimes they are not empty accusations, and that is how bad people get caught. Either way the bad person will get caught, because if the investigation reveals that people are just being racist, then we will know.
Remember, I am not saying just to investigate the Mosque, I am saying investigate the accusers also.
It is really not a problem, and you agree, because you have gone and done a little homework yourself, and commenced your own investigation, and came up with an answer. So wtf is the problem? Are you paranoid also?
So it's ok for you to go and investigate this situation, but it is not ok for me to suggest that it might be a good idea to? More hypocrisy from you, highly illogical. Once again your emotions get the best of you, and you miss out on the finer things in life.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 315 by Rrhain, posted 09-04-2010 4:06 AM Rrhain has not replied

Huntard
Member (Idle past 2317 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 335 of 406 (579983)
09-07-2010 7:12 AM
Reply to: Message 314 by Rrhain
09-04-2010 3:49 AM


Rrhain writes:
Same question to you as to onifre:
Who are "they"?
The muslims that deliberately act offensive towards others.
It's so easy to be against "them" when you don't know who "they" are.
If you want names and adresses then sorry, but I can;t provide them.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 314 by Rrhain, posted 09-04-2010 3:49 AM Rrhain has not replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 438 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 336 of 406 (579984)
09-07-2010 7:12 AM
Reply to: Message 316 by Rrhain
09-04-2010 4:14 AM


"Rhain" writes:
No. "Someone said" is hardly grounds for search.
You have much to learn. It is absolutely enough.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 316 by Rrhain, posted 09-04-2010 4:14 AM Rrhain has not replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 438 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 337 of 406 (579985)
09-07-2010 7:17 AM
Reply to: Message 317 by Rrhain
09-04-2010 4:37 AM


"Rrhain" writes:
You also want Muslims under investigation.
No I don't.
you only seem to get upset with regard to Muslims, not Christians.
No I don't.
Just because the news isn't covering it (and by the way, it is...the fact that you aren't paying attention is not evidence that it isn't being covered.
It has nothing to do with this thread. feel free to start another one, and I would express my views on it, after I learn a little about it. funny how you accuse me of how I feel about something I know nothing about.
Surely you have no problem with being investigated, right?
No I don't.
What I have a problem with is after the investigation, the people falsely accusing me of something should pay for the hassle they caused me.
Would you know one if it bit you?
Yep, see two posts ago.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 317 by Rrhain, posted 09-04-2010 4:37 AM Rrhain has not replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 438 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 338 of 406 (579987)
09-07-2010 7:34 AM
Reply to: Message 319 by Dr Adequate
09-04-2010 5:07 AM


Re: Opening date of the Mosque
"Dr.Adequate" writes:
Actually, it does mean something. It means that the FBI has checked them out, that the State Department under Bush has checked them out, and that the State Department under Obama has checked them out.
Cool, thanks for supporting what I was saying.
So, are you, or are you not, a secret Muslim terrorist? Of course, you appear not to be, but it is your job to hide in plain sight, and you haven't been checked out by the FBI and two successive State Departments.
Since no-one has accused me of anything, then I am ok. But before you decide to accuse me of anything, you should also be willing to pay the price if you are wrong, and are just making unfounded racist remarks.
You seem to be implying that you said that they should be checked out further
I didn't mean that.
Two successive governments have apparently investigated the question, and yet people are not calm.
I think the situation has diminished a bit. I also think media is to blame for most of this, as usual. You could report about these things without creating a stir, and they don't because they want a stir. Kind of like what Rrhain does.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 319 by Dr Adequate, posted 09-04-2010 5:07 AM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 353 by Dr Adequate, posted 09-07-2010 12:46 PM riVeRraT has not replied

Huntard
Member (Idle past 2317 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 339 of 406 (579988)
09-07-2010 7:41 AM
Reply to: Message 323 by AZPaul3
09-04-2010 11:54 AM


Re: But the point is
AZPaul3 writes:
Would you deliberately do something hateful, spiteful and offensive to your Mother? Your best friend?
My mother? Depends. IF she really deserved it (not that I think she could ever do something that deserves that, but say, she has a fit of "insanity", and thinks only praying for my brother is enough to heal him and he dies, you betcha.)
My best friend? All the time, that's how we roll.
Don't get into hyperbole. We're not talking about giving inadvertent offense, which is too easy to do these days in a PC climate. Not even a periodic joke or one of Oni's hilariously offensive schticks would count.
Agree.
We're talking about taking an unnecessary action to deliberately be offensive out of pure malice. Doesn't matter if the target is one or a million.
It all depends.
Hang a big "NIGGER!" sign on your house. Post a large Nazi flag across the street from the Synagogue. Hang a cartoon caricature of Muhammad out your window.
I'd never do that.
You certainly have the right to do these things, but are you really one of the crazy zealots hateful enough to do these things?
No, I don;t know anyone who deserves this. If there was a mosque, say, that is nothing bu spreading hatespeech and being violent, than yes, I would. I'm a dick, you see (if I want to), but not an asshole.
Other than a demented sociopath, why would anyone go out of their way to do such a thing or even contemplate such a thing in an open public forum?
To consider giving them a piece of their own mind? If someone thinks they can insult someone but get special privileges themselves, I'll be there to point out they can't have it both ways.
This has nothing to do with being PC. It has to do with pure unadulterated hate. Yet, this is exactly what Taz is contemplating and you are defending. Why?
I am not defending hate. I am making a point that people should grow a fucking pair and not be insulted by every little thing. That's basically what I am saying. Also, if a particualr gourp finds, say, painting your house pink the most heinous thing there is, and they in their meetings preach that we should kill people who paint there house pink, guess what, I'll paint their "preach center" pink.
Fuck irrational beliefs and hate mongering. You wanna be tough, you bettter take a few hits yourself. Crying that "everybody is so insulting" towards you when you are insulting towards others is hypocrisy.
No, I'm not saying all muslims are, I realize there are many that denounce all of that. I am not speaking about them though, I am talking about the ones that are assholes.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 323 by AZPaul3, posted 09-04-2010 11:54 AM AZPaul3 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 349 by AZPaul3, posted 09-07-2010 11:37 AM Huntard has replied

frako
Member (Idle past 327 days)
Posts: 2932
From: slovenija
Joined: 09-04-2010


Message 340 of 406 (579989)
09-07-2010 7:43 AM
Reply to: Message 332 by riVeRraT
09-07-2010 6:58 AM


Re: Listen
so what you are saying that today there are no christians that let say want to kill all african-american peapole, no christian terrorist that walk in to a liberal gathering and kill a few liberals and gays cause they are upset whit them.
there are dangerus fundamentalist in almost every religion an jut like you dont aprove abbout those christian fundamentalists, most muslims dont aprove the 9.11 attack
athough i don't think its very ethical or smart to put a mosque near ground 0 and that it will cause more problems like riots and protests

This message is a reply to:
 Message 332 by riVeRraT, posted 09-07-2010 6:58 AM riVeRraT has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 341 by Nij, posted 09-07-2010 8:06 AM frako has replied
 Message 343 by jar, posted 09-07-2010 8:20 AM frako has replied

Nij
Member (Idle past 4911 days)
Posts: 239
From: New Zealand
Joined: 08-20-2010


Message 341 of 406 (579995)
09-07-2010 8:06 AM
Reply to: Message 340 by frako
09-07-2010 7:43 AM


Re: Listen
I'm going to say this now, as I have many times previously:
There is no mosque in the planned community centre. There is a prayer room, intended for use by all religions, without preference to any one in partcular.
It's perfectly ethical and smart for the reasons they are doing so: to attempt improving relations between the general US public and the Muslim community. Also, because it's likely the only site they could get in the area.
It's only causing problems because of bigotry and prejudice. Those protesting it have no idea why it's being built; heck, they can't even get what the thing will actually be right. If the mosque can go ahead, it will solve those problems itself -- that's why it's getting built.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 340 by frako, posted 09-07-2010 7:43 AM frako has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 342 by frako, posted 09-07-2010 8:19 AM Nij has not replied

frako
Member (Idle past 327 days)
Posts: 2932
From: slovenija
Joined: 09-04-2010


(1)
Message 342 of 406 (580001)
09-07-2010 8:19 AM
Reply to: Message 341 by Nij
09-07-2010 8:06 AM


Re: Listen
sorry i dint know it was for all religions, if it where a mosque it would be simmilar to a maximal securety warden putting a white supremasist and a african american gang member in the same cell to help them work out their diferences its just something you don't do.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 341 by Nij, posted 09-07-2010 8:06 AM Nij has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 343 of 406 (580002)
09-07-2010 8:20 AM
Reply to: Message 340 by frako
09-07-2010 7:43 AM


Re: Listen
Just a heads-up.
There is already a Mosque near Ground Zero, in fact has been since around the time the towers were built, maybe even before the Towers were built. It's really small though, so small that during prayers many of the congregation cannot get inside and end up spreading their prayer rugs on the sidewalk and street. This has been true for many decades and I have personally witnessed the Muslims there.
If you have Google maps search for "Masjid Manhattan". Zoom in and you can see how close it is.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 340 by frako, posted 09-07-2010 7:43 AM frako has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 344 by frako, posted 09-07-2010 8:38 AM jar has seen this message but not replied

frako
Member (Idle past 327 days)
Posts: 2932
From: slovenija
Joined: 09-04-2010


Message 344 of 406 (580005)
09-07-2010 8:38 AM
Reply to: Message 343 by jar
09-07-2010 8:20 AM


Re: Listen
and im also guessing there are no protests in front of it. cause its not somthing new that gets people riled up. its just somthing politicians should reconsider before allowe somthing that can cause an evan bigger rift between 2 community's.
for example if my naighbur would have sold his house and than a church, mosque, .... would be built there i would have no problems whit it as long as they dont keep me up at night (they never did anything that would efect me in a bad way) . if however Romani (gyp...) where to start building their "houses" there i might have a problem cause i had loads of stuff stolen form them. i know it sound like im a biggot and hater and that i should give them the benefit of a doubt but its in human nature to to apply the traits of individuals to the whole community from witch they come.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 343 by jar, posted 09-07-2010 8:20 AM jar has seen this message but not replied

hooah212002
Member (Idle past 823 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 345 of 406 (580006)
09-07-2010 8:45 AM
Reply to: Message 332 by riVeRraT
09-07-2010 6:58 AM


Re: Listen
It's simple, really. Is the OT necessary for christianity or not? Can you have christianity without it?
My point is: there is a book that people look to for guidance and find meaning in. If they find a particular passage that suits what they feel, they are justified in carrying out those actions because they have scripture (mere words in a book) to back them up. You cannot deny that those words are indeed there.
Jesus was the completion of the law.
Not that I care right now to get into a discussion about what the bible means, but I am pretty sure jesus did not come to change the law of the OT. But you see, anyone can interpret the words of the bible however they want and there is no way YOU can tell me I am wrong just because it's not what you want to hear.

Your god believes in Unicorns

This message is a reply to:
 Message 332 by riVeRraT, posted 09-07-2010 6:58 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 375 by riVeRraT, posted 09-08-2010 7:07 AM hooah212002 has seen this message but not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024