This has to be about the worst application of 'logic' I have ever seen.
You seem deeply, deeply confused - neither your arguments nor your conclusions make sense.
As far as we know, no other animal denies it is an animal. erm...as far as we know, no other animal is able to do so. What does that prove?
As far as we know, no other animal worships god. erm....as far as we know, no other animal is able to do so. What does that prove?
>a) If we are to believe evolution theory incorporates man: Because
> a large amount of humans are denying their animal nature, they are
> doing something that no other animal has ever done.
Yes.... there are a lot of things that all sorts of animals have done that no others have.
> b) If we believe creationism incorporates man: We were created by
> God.
> c) Some other scientific theory
What, if anything, is your actual point?
™ Version 4.2