Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,912 Year: 4,169/9,624 Month: 1,040/974 Week: 367/286 Day: 10/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evolution for Dummies and Christians
Graculus
Inactive Member


Message 57 of 299 (245937)
09-23-2005 11:08 AM
Reply to: Message 23 by Siguiendo la verdad
06-06-2005 12:44 PM


Re: Why do we have a seven day week?
Historical accident.
In various times and places the week has not been seven days. However, the Romans had a seven day week when they ruled the Western world, so we got stuck with it (originaly the Romans had an 8 day week). It originated with the Babylonians, who were big into numerology and astrology. The Hebrews picked it up from them.
It's also a convenient division of the lunar month.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by Siguiendo la verdad, posted 06-06-2005 12:44 PM Siguiendo la verdad has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 58 by jar, posted 09-23-2005 11:22 AM Graculus has not replied

Graculus
Inactive Member


Message 109 of 299 (246929)
09-28-2005 10:08 AM
Reply to: Message 79 by thure
09-27-2005 12:51 PM


Quote: Tom Bethell (1976)
An article for Harper's, written by a Creationist with no related qualifications. To present this as evidence of some sort of controversy in science is extremely dishonest.
Eldredge, Niles "Time Frames: The Rethinking of Darwinian Evolution and the Theory of Punctuated Equilibria,"
This is a mined quote, that is, stripped of context so that the speaker is presented as saying something that are not actually saying.
The "interpretation" and "story" he is talking about is NOT evolution, but phyletic gradualism. From later in the same paragraph: "Throughout it all, adaptation shines through as an important theme". Actually, what he's talking about is how paleontologist should discuss mode and tempo more than they did at the time.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 79 by thure, posted 09-27-2005 12:51 PM thure has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 112 by thure, posted 09-28-2005 12:02 PM Graculus has replied

Graculus
Inactive Member


Message 116 of 299 (246996)
09-28-2005 2:53 PM
Reply to: Message 112 by thure
09-28-2005 12:02 PM


I was quoting others not because they had particular qualifications but because they can state things more eloquently then I.
Which is why you quoted someone who didn't actually say what you represented him as saying, right?
That's still dishonest.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 112 by thure, posted 09-28-2005 12:02 PM thure has not replied

Graculus
Inactive Member


Message 175 of 299 (247898)
10-01-2005 9:42 AM
Reply to: Message 152 by thure
09-30-2005 5:26 PM


Re: Quotations, mutations, litigation............& spinal taps
Show me the money, show me the expansion of GENETIC diversity, oh so nessessary for evolution.
Tell us what, *exactly*, you mean by "genetic diversity", then we can work on showing it to you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 152 by thure, posted 09-30-2005 5:26 PM thure has not replied

Graculus
Inactive Member


Message 180 of 299 (249178)
10-05-2005 3:59 PM
Reply to: Message 179 by ausar_maat
10-05-2005 1:00 PM


Re: time for a new subtitle
Actually, there are Creationist movements in Islam and Hinduism, too.
The key to these conflicts seems to be "revealed truth".. all of these religions have texts that are supposedly the word of the God(s).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 179 by ausar_maat, posted 10-05-2005 1:00 PM ausar_maat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 181 by ausar_maat, posted 10-06-2005 7:09 AM Graculus has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024