quote:
Here is what the historian Sherwin-White said about the book of Acts which does state that Jesus appeared and he appeared in many infallible proofs:
"For Acts the confirmation of historicity is overwhelming. Any attempt to reject its basic historicity even in matters of detail must now appear absurd." (Sherwin-White, Roman Society, p. 189).
Good. Now what is Dr. Sherwin-White's arguments and/or evidence that the "confirmation of historicity is overwhelming?"
-
Numerous arguments have been put forth by legal scholars such as Simon Greenleaf, John Warwick Montgomery and others stating that western legal standards argue for the historicity of the resurrection of Christ.
Again, very good. What are some of these "numerous arguments"?
"Intellectually, scientifically, even artistically, fundamentalism -- biblical literalism -- is a road to nowhere, because it insists on fidelity to revealed truths that are not true." -- Katha Pollitt