Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Pakicetus being presented with webbed feet.
Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3945
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 141 of 305 (264209)
11-29-2005 5:08 PM
Reply to: Message 139 by randman
11-29-2005 4:56 PM


Webbed/not webbed - Who cares, why not talk about the "hard parts" evidence
Any illustration going beyond the hard parts evidence is (probably) going to be speculative. There is no way of knowing either way. Had the illustration been done without webbed feet, it also might be wrong. Had it been done such, should there be someone complaining that there is no evidence to support the depiction of non-webbed feet?
The more solid evidence to compare are the respective skeletons.
Almost, but not posted in the admin-mode,
Moose

This message is a reply to:
 Message 139 by randman, posted 11-29-2005 4:56 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 142 by randman, posted 11-29-2005 5:18 PM Minnemooseus has replied

Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3945
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 144 of 305 (264223)
11-29-2005 5:33 PM
Reply to: Message 142 by randman
11-29-2005 5:18 PM


Re: Webbed/not webbed - Who cares, why not talk about the "hard parts" evidence
Now, we find out the creature looks no more like a whale than a goat does, and does not resemble the descriptions and characterizations as an aquatic animal very much at all.
Rand, I think you need to directly respond to the content of message 97.
Regardless of whether or not "earlier depictions were sensationalized", the information of the above cited seems to be the state of the art knowledge on the matter.
Moose

This message is a reply to:
 Message 142 by randman, posted 11-29-2005 5:18 PM randman has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024