Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Pakicetus being presented with webbed feet.
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3992
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 7.5


Message 185 of 305 (264709)
12-01-2005 10:15 AM
Reply to: Message 173 by randman
12-01-2005 2:41 AM


These images fooled billions!
In the context of this thread, the peer-review stuff is immaterial. This thread is about the slant evos put on the data they present to the public and students, and imo, using faulty artistic renditions designed to sway the reader that Pakicetus was aquatic when he was not, and there was insufficient evidence to even make a valid claim that he was, is misleading and deceptive.
Hi, rand. I'm glad I've finally found a sympathetic listener to my plaint. The dishonesty and deception of the artist renditions below speaks for itself. Will you join me in my attempt to find someone "man enough" to admit that?
This one is just silly--though we don't have photos or fossils, we know the subject couldn't have looked anything like this. But images of this kind have been used to brainwash billions! He is kinda cute,though.
Blue-eyed Jesus
This one may have been well-intentioned, but it is certainly no more honest:
Black Jesus
Based on what some claim about the subject's geographic origin and time of birth, some say this image is more congenial to the truth, but it is still totally conjecture:
Semitic Jesus
Well, as you can see, we've got our work cut out for us!
Never mind those silly pakiwhatsits--people who truly think for themselvs don't read those stupid nature magazines, anyway, and these images impact far, far more people.
As you can imagine, these untruths, these willful deceptions, and many, many, many others, are what led me to reject the whole shebang.
Not only do such images have no basis in fact, their creators have the nerve to tailor them for each regional set of suckers!
As though we wouldn't notice! They are not only dishonest but downright insulting as well.
I look forward to working with you on correcting the record. If you are too busy with sneaky webbed feet, though, donations will do.
Edit: Converted images to links per Better Form.
This message has been edited by Omnivorous, 12-02-2005 01:25 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 173 by randman, posted 12-01-2005 2:41 AM randman has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 194 by Coragyps, posted 12-01-2005 2:01 PM Omnivorous has not replied

Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3992
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 7.5


Message 192 of 305 (264752)
12-01-2005 12:58 PM
Reply to: Message 191 by jar
12-01-2005 12:41 PM


Re: real, technical illustrations.
Yeah, on land I'm Yogi Bear, but in the water I'm Clark Gable. Amazing what a little slick-down can do.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 191 by jar, posted 12-01-2005 12:41 PM jar has not replied

Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3992
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 7.5


Message 205 of 305 (264806)
12-01-2005 4:36 PM
Reply to: Message 201 by randman
12-01-2005 4:20 PM


Re: Respond to what?
You didn't like the Jesus pix? How about this?
We now have a 9th Archaeopteryx fossil. The previous 8 fossils had supported the interpretation that Archie had a bird-like foot. The new fossil is so pristine, however, that researchers now can see that Archie instead had a dinosaur-like foot: much better evidence for evolution, of course--but then why didn't those dishonest evos make that claim all along? And this case involves actual fossil specimens, not drawings or paintings.
Following the evidence, making the best interpretation of the evidence in hand...
You were challenged to respond to substantive posts above of which there have been many. I posted those Jesus graphics to demonstrate your argument reduced to its absurdity.
Which you knew, which you know: are you, at last, simply a troll, Rand?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 201 by randman, posted 12-01-2005 4:20 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 207 by randman, posted 12-01-2005 4:41 PM Omnivorous has replied

Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3992
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 7.5


Message 212 of 305 (264815)
12-01-2005 4:55 PM
Reply to: Message 207 by randman
12-01-2005 4:41 PM


OK
I give up: you are invincibly what you are.
Koreans say a burglar cannot sleep in his own house.
I guess you can go on trolling the board, but I'll leave you to those with more patience.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 207 by randman, posted 12-01-2005 4:41 PM randman has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024