Big Bang Problem

Lightning. See the flash, count ten seconds to hear the thunder.

If all the stars in the universe exploded, we wouldn't hear or see that event for years, alfa centauri would be the first one we would see explode. However, if we got caught up in some vast time dilation consequencial anomoly effect, we would be fried chicken at black hole mean time. How's that for a combustable catastrophism. Which means the stretchathon marathon would render me six foot and 2 million in-escapable light years. However, if the stars are attached to the firmament then the universe is infact 2 dimensional, rendering me a comic character in Dan Carrolls picturethon/-->>

Erm, I'd rather hear that from the horses mouth. Which message did Sylas say that in??And also, even if he wasn't a fan of the bible, he still believes in what he is saying.One thing is for sure though, you don't know anything about the universe, so to suggest the Big Bang Theory is a religion is a bit silly. The bible itself has no say on the issue. As Minnemooseus pointed out, "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth".Therefore there is no need to arrive at the assumption that this theory is against the scripture. It is only the whim of a desperate creationist to suggest this theory is against God. Hugh Ross's "The creation event" television series, shows us how the Big Bang could have been the creation event. Using totally scientific logic, he deduces that ofcourse it can be how God created the universe. Also, Sylas did point out the evidence to you and he even shown you how you can put your tv on and "see" the evidence for yourself.BTW - welcome to the forum anyway, I know that's a late welcome......It does good to know that claiming science is a religion will not go down well here at the forum. I myself have discovered that science is the antithesis of religion. With religion, we start with an assumption - (I had to suffer the wrath of Schraff because of this). But, in this case and in the case of all sciences, we have independent evidence to verify the theories. Sylas tried to show you this with his five examples of evidence. When independent evidence is found that corroborates a theory, the theory indeed will hold water. If I have a theory that says the universe had a big bang start, and in the future evidence was found for that - Well then you can obviously see the point to the argument.It is good that you ask questions and I am also a christian , but when asking your many questions, maybe you should hold off on the "conclusions". It will only serve to frustrate people, as can be seen with Lam.