Big Bang Problem

Some comments:Why was the singularity spinning? What was it spinning respect to?The conservation of angular momentum is a consequence of the rotational symmetry of spacetime (a la Noether's theorem.) Why would a Big Bang singularity even obey such a concept when it was not embedded in a pre-existing spacetime for such a symmetry to be present? Such a symmetry would also not be present in the initial spacetime expansion - at small enough distance/time scales since we don't have a quantum theory of gravity we don't know what conversation laws held, what form they took or even if they existed.If several bodies interact hydrodynamic/hydromagnetic/gravitational forces can change the total angular momentum of each body - as long as the total remains the same conservation holds.The spin of planets etc. has NOTHING to do with the Big Bang. Also planets etc. would have undergone many impacts/interactings during their formation.

Oh and I think you meant 'Big Bang problem'. I must admit I have problems with many Big Bands. I thought Glenn Miller was boring!

Yes it is a myth - but in controlled experiments it can be observed. Just not in your home toilet.

Des,You can claim 'evolution' is not science until you are blue in the face - but that doesn't make it so.You say that you support 'real science' but somehow are against evolution which I would tender is real science.Last time I checked you are not the arbiter of what is and what isn't science.In fact what is and what isn't science in your view should be replaced with the phrase - what I agree with is science but what I don't agree with is not science. One could say that it not a 'scientific' approach.Perhaps you could inform us of the wealth of scientific expertise that you posess that enable these sweeping statements of yours. Or is it, as I think more likely, more useless appeals from a personal incredulity.