Register | Sign In

Understanding through Discussion

EvC Forum active members: 48 (9179 total)
0 online now:
Newest Member: Jorge Parker
Post Volume: Total: 918,248 Year: 5,505/9,624 Month: 530/323 Week: 27/143 Day: 0/17 Hour: 0/0

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   ANOTHER Political Quiz
Member (Idle past 94 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005

Message 93 of 102 (727790)
05-20-2014 3:29 PM
Reply to: Message 92 by xongsmith
05-20-2014 2:50 PM

Re: Referendum DD at End of Term/s
...and you'll be right behind me in line for a referendum to make Pi = 3.00000
I've always wonder why creos are not interested in teaching this 'controversy'?

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 92 by xongsmith, posted 05-20-2014 2:50 PM xongsmith has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 95 by Tanypteryx, posted 05-20-2014 3:43 PM Larni has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024