The End of Evolution By Means of Natural Selection

Natural selection has not disappeared, it performs its primary role - the stabilization of the genome. MacroDevolution, which began in end of Vend, also continue until there remain only a highly specialized dead-end species. But evolution and macro-evolution was not at all. This invention, which creationists once deftly introduced in biology to endlessly criticize this clumsy its design and thus engage in missionary work. Very convenient.
Evolutionists, creationists know that if you compare the fact of the eye with a lens and the mechanisms of accommodation in modern jellyfish, polychaetes, and some terrestrial carnivorous tropical turbellarians, (plus one molecular genetic work: Just a moment...), then the whole theory of evolution from primary prmitiv monads to the "crown of nature" simply falls to pieces. Therefore, in trying to debate these facts do not mention it. For the same reason, try to conceal the fact that modern cestodes and perrier-eminent Venda organisms morphologically alike as two peas in a pod. Quite the same bilateral symmetry of glide reflection, the same Scolex and strobes! Only Vendian cestodes were not parasites - living freely. And this is why evolutionists, creationists silent it fact that if you study the imprints of scolex, there can be found with imprints of the eye mit lens and tentacles with suckers! And then another, and a heavy brain ortogon type ... And this is also the potential to break the whole theory.
Spacenoology Edited by Rakshas, : No reason given.Edited by Rakshas, : No reason given.

I - not "them". I am not a creationist and an evolutionist. I'm an devolutionist. My guess is that the peptide-nucleic technology - a product applied engineering design of several billion years ago, and then under the action of natural selection, divided into many species, began to lose its universality and devolve to specialize in different niches. And I have a good reason for this hypothesis.SpacenoologyJust as multicellularity - the product is applied socio-engineering design - a little more than a billion years ago. Also lost starting universalism, specialized by natural selection. For this hypothesis, too, have a good reason. SpacenoologyReligion is not to blame. But when the evolutionist calls the "science" its speculative, false "evolution" - is an aggressive religion that hinders science.Well, of course, when the evolutionist, as a creationist, is a polemical impasse, their arguments - the indictments cliche - is irrelevant to the scientific controversy. This was in the Soviet era Lysenko.

Logically, the eye with the lens, and several alternative mechanisms exist for the accommodation of some already exist in Wend, and species not having the eyes were degradation products in those niches, which did not require sight. This is also observed in our time of cave fish and salamanders.

Yes, I am forced to use the Google translator