EvC Forum: The End of Evolution By Means of Natural Selection

Email This Thread

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Author

Topic: The End of Evolution By Means of Natural Selection

Theodoric

Member

Posts: 9489

From: Northwest, WI, USA

Joined: 08-15-2005

Member Rating: 6.1

Normal Thread Display

(1)

Message 141 of 851 (552749)
03-30-2010 10:20 PM

Reply to: Message 85 by Faith
03-27-2010 4:07 PM

Re: A new theory of evolution by mutation?

Human evolution from a supposed common ancestor with chimps couldn't have happened.

Here in a nutshell is where we see your whole issue.
Where has any person that understands evolution stated this? I have said before Faith that you need to learn the positions you are arguing before you post on them. If you got this from a source, they are lying to you.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
	Message 85 by Faith, posted 03-27-2010 4:07 PM		Faith has not replied

Theodoric

Member

Posts: 9489

From: Northwest, WI, USA

Joined: 08-15-2005

Member Rating: 6.1

Normal Thread Display

Message 588 of 851 (557339)
04-24-2010 5:50 PM

Reply to: Message 587 by hawkes nightmare
04-24-2010 5:43 PM

Re: general understanding

wikipedia is not a reliable source.

Please show that the info presented from wikipedia is not accurate.

Oh you can't?

The don't bother us with your lame posts.

You may have noticed that this wiki post has noted and links. People with basic interest in knowledge would follow those to original sources to confirm the info.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
	Message 587 by hawkes nightmare, posted 04-24-2010 5:43 PM		hawkes nightmare has not replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 594 by Faith, posted 04-24-2010 8:29 PM		Theodoric has replied

Theodoric

Member

Posts: 9489

From: Northwest, WI, USA

Joined: 08-15-2005

Member Rating: 6.1

Normal Thread Display

(1)

Message 597 of 851 (557379)
04-24-2010 9:25 PM

Reply to: Message 594 by Faith
04-24-2010 8:29 PM

Re: general understanding

Again I will ask. Is there anything in the article in question that is inaccurate?

Have you bothered to see if it is accurate? This persecution complex you fundies have is unbelievable. What the hell is an "evolutionist"? I didn't know that I and the other anti-creationists had one brain.

I agree that Wiki needs to be used carefully. The vast majority of it is quite accurate, but the nature of the beast is that it must be used critically.

Now show me that the article in question is inaccurate.

Of course you can't. Now why don't you post on something that you may actually bring some real substance to. I know it will be difficult, but try.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
	Message 594 by Faith, posted 04-24-2010 8:29 PM		Faith has not replied

Theodoric

Member

Posts: 9489

From: Northwest, WI, USA

Joined: 08-15-2005

Member Rating: 6.1

Normal Thread Display

Message 822 of 851 (577818)
08-30-2010 2:35 PM

Reply to: Message 821 by Percy
08-30-2010 1:57 PM

Bluegene and Taq,

Neat! Thanks!

Right there you show the difference between bolder, archie type posters and those not completely driven by their religious faith. You are willing to conceded and acknowledge you do not know everything and that you can and are willing to learn.

Why can the creo/fundie side admit they might not know everything and actually may be wrong about some things?

This message is a reply to:
	Message 821 by Percy, posted 08-30-2010 1:57 PM		Percy has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 823 by barbara, posted 09-08-2010 3:43 PM		Theodoric has not replied

Date format: mm-dd-yyyy

Timezone: ET (US)

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Do Nothing Button

0 online now:
Newest Member:	The Rutificador chile
Post Volume:	Total: 919,507 Year: 6,764/9,624 Month: 104/238 Week: 21/83 Day: 4/0 Hour: 0/0