Evidence for Intelligent Design-is there any?

That statement is always followed by "however, upon further study of said phenomenon we find that a perfectly good naturalistic explanation is found that removes the 'appearence' of design to the person working directly with the phenomenon."So yes it may 'appear' designed, but no, after further study of it, its apparent that naturalistic causes are responsible. It has been pointed out to you in the past here on EVC that there are many natural structures on this planet that 'appear' designed but we know were caused my natural processes, so why do you continue to make a plee for the 'appearance' of design being actual proof for design?Do you have evidence for design other than your opinion of how nature appears to look? I believe thats whats being asked.Edited by onifre, : spelling

---

"All great truths begin as blasphemies""I smoke pot. If this bothers anyone, I suggest you look around at the world in which we live and shut your mouth."--Bill Hicks"I never knew there was another option other than to question everything"--Noam Chomsky

This is a cop-out answer.Basically what you're saying is:"Im talking about a programmer that I have imagined to be superior because I personally can't see any other way in which anything can be coded naturally. I have never seen nor been shown evidence for the existance of said designer, but I have to imagine there is one because I cannot understand complexity without it."This does not equal evidence...this is an argument from incredulity.
Argument from incredulity - Wikipedia Again, here you show some double talk. If it's comparable to human technology then it is not Godly in any way. Evolved apes came up with computer programs, if DNA was the result of some superior God-like programming then it, by definition, could not be comparable to anything humans designed.And if it has no resemblace to human technology, then how do you know what you're looking at and judging to be superior? It would be beyond your scope of comprehension. Something equivalent to magic perhaps.

---

"All great truths begin as blasphemies""I smoke pot. If this bothers anyone, I suggest you look around at the world in which we live and shut your mouth."--Bill Hicks"I never knew there was another option other than to question everything"--Noam Chomsky

First, pick on me not pot, it has done nothing to you for you to be so negative towards it.Second, the reasoning accessment I gave you was of your own words. You said, " The DNA systems function like a computer", (Message 128), then when you were called out on it you changed your opinion and said, "Not human technology - superior technology fit for a God /great universal creator"(Message 133).Then I just asked, "how can you determine any of this to begin with?"I'd like an answer if you don't mind...

---

"All great truths begin as blasphemies""I smoke pot. If this bothers anyone, I suggest you look around at the world in which we live and shut your mouth."--Bill Hicks"I never knew there was another option other than to question everything"--Noam Chomsky

Yet theres a whole sport dedicated to this and 100s of thousands of people build them everyday, and your point is what? This is again an argument from incredulity, this is pointless dribble. I don't know what you mean by this... You are not answering any specific questions, nor are you tackling the issue of complexity equalling design.Seems like you are just trolling.

---

"All great truths begin as blasphemies""I smoke pot. If this bothers anyone, I suggest you look around at the world in which we live and shut your mouth."--Bill Hicks"I never knew there was another option other than to question everything"--Noam Chomsky