Evidence for Intelligent Design-is there any?

Thread moved here from the Creation/Evolution In The News forum.This is not a "in the news" post it is a good new topic proposal so I have moved it as if it was put in the Proposed New Topics thread.You need to clarify how limited you want the thread to be:As as been noted elsewhere some people will take issue with the validity of your points as an argument against evolution. Others will point out (as has been done) that an argument against evolution is not, in itself, any kind of positive evidence for ID.Do you want this thread to be only about how these points are or are not evidence for ID? Or will you allow posters to rise issues with the validity of the points.My strong suggestion is that this thread be restricted to the issue you make in it's title. That is, the validity of the individual points NOT be discussed here. You should, however, be prepared to defend them if anyone raises them in individual threads.If we allow discussion of the individual points the thread will have much, much too wide a range of topics.Edited by AdminNosy, : No reason given.

As noted in the previous post dokukaeru. The validity of the items in the list are too diverse to be discussed in this thread.If you wish to discuss the two items you bring up here then make 2 separate threads for them. Or find open threads on the topic.

But not in this thread! I suggest, Subbie, that you start a new thread for this.

You'll have to be the first example, John. You haven't even attempted to supply any evidence for ID here.You have 12 hours to think about what such evidence might look like or search the web for some.There has been enough discussion about staying on topic. You didn't, you're taking a break.

Since, Bob, this is also not on topic I'm going to have to suspend you too. You're newer and haven't had this harped on so much. 6 hours for you.

Beretta, you can take 6 hours off to figure out how to respond and stay on topic.