Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evidence for Intelligent Design-is there any?
RickJB
Member (Idle past 5020 days)
Posts: 917
From: London, UK
Joined: 04-14-2006


Message 13 of 220 (480510)
09-04-2008 7:17 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Beretta
09-03-2008 10:47 AM


Everything you list is an argument against Evolution. Even if the ToE was wrong, that wouldn't validate ID by default.
You have no positive evidence for ID, instead you rely solely on inaccurate ToE criticism.
When presenting positive evidence for ID you should not need to make any reference to the ToE.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Beretta, posted 09-03-2008 10:47 AM Beretta has not replied

  
RickJB
Member (Idle past 5020 days)
Posts: 917
From: London, UK
Joined: 04-14-2006


Message 15 of 220 (480512)
09-04-2008 7:47 AM
Reply to: Message 14 by LucyTheApe
09-04-2008 7:28 AM


Re: What other options are there?
Lucy writes:
If there aren't any other theories then evidence against evolution, it seems, is evidence for Intelligent Design.
No, because we could have been created by accident by intergalactic robots.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by LucyTheApe, posted 09-04-2008 7:28 AM LucyTheApe has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by LucyTheApe, posted 09-04-2008 8:12 AM RickJB has replied
 Message 102 by XX, posted 09-12-2008 12:33 PM RickJB has not replied

  
RickJB
Member (Idle past 5020 days)
Posts: 917
From: London, UK
Joined: 04-14-2006


Message 17 of 220 (480520)
09-04-2008 8:22 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by LucyTheApe
09-04-2008 8:12 AM


Re: What other options are there?
Lucy writes:
Fortunately robots don't do anything by accident, they only do what they're programmed to do.
But these are special robots.
You see, that's the thing - in lieu of any evidence I can argue for just about anything and you can't provide any counter-evidence. This is why ID isn't true by default. Without any positive evidence there could be other possibilities.
Edited by RickJB, : No reason given.
Edited by RickJB, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by LucyTheApe, posted 09-04-2008 8:12 AM LucyTheApe has not replied

  
RickJB
Member (Idle past 5020 days)
Posts: 917
From: London, UK
Joined: 04-14-2006


Message 20 of 220 (480536)
09-04-2008 9:32 AM
Reply to: Message 19 by Beretta
09-04-2008 9:28 AM


Re: The Cambrian Explosion
Beretta writes:
We would expect everything diverse to appear complex and suddenly which is why it works far better for ID then it does for gradualism.
According to what ID model?
Picking at the ToE won't get you any closer to providing positive evidence for ID, but showing us your ID model will.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Beretta, posted 09-04-2008 9:28 AM Beretta has not replied

  
RickJB
Member (Idle past 5020 days)
Posts: 917
From: London, UK
Joined: 04-14-2006


Message 25 of 220 (480547)
09-04-2008 10:23 AM
Reply to: Message 23 by Beretta
09-04-2008 10:06 AM


Re: What other options are there?
Beretta writes:
Why? Evidence against the one IS evidence for the other....
No. Even if you demonstrate evolution to be wrong then there could be other ways that, as you put it, "nothing created everything".
Beretta writes:
You just have to consider that for a little while and apart from the obvious absurdities, that is all there is.
Without any positive evidence of any sort of creator how can you truly know what is absurd and what isn't?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by Beretta, posted 09-04-2008 10:06 AM Beretta has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024