Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 49 (9215 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: Cifa.ac
Post Volume: Total: 920,175 Year: 497/6,935 Month: 497/275 Week: 14/200 Day: 8/6 Hour: 0/1


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Intelligent Design ⇒

Quality Control the Gold Standard

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Quality Control the Gold Standard
SuperNintendo Chalmers
Member (Idle past 6131 days)
Posts: 772
From: Bartlett, IL, USA
Joined: 12-27-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 178 of 238 (286629)
02-14-2006 5:52 PM 		Reply to: Message 176 by cavediver
02-14-2006 5:43 PM

Re: Sig Figs
Really? Absolute crap. Where do you get your maths degree?
​
Here in the states we covered Significant figures in 9th grade (freshman in high school) science class......... (at least in Montgomery County, MD schools)
This message is a reply to:
 Message 176 by cavediver, posted 02-14-2006 5:43 PM cavediver has not replied
SuperNintendo Chalmers
Member (Idle past 6131 days)
Posts: 772
From: Bartlett, IL, USA
Joined: 12-27-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 225 of 238 (287694)
02-17-2006 2:07 PM 		Reply to: Message 215 by Evopeach
02-17-2006 10:33 AM

Hate to pile on
I hate to pile on Evopeach... But are there any examples of Creation science papers he has published? Even a paper (if it's scientific) from a creation science publication (do they have those?) might be of interest.
​
Regards
This message is a reply to:
 Message 215 by Evopeach, posted 02-17-2006 10:33 AM Evopeach has not replied
SuperNintendo Chalmers
Member (Idle past 6131 days)
Posts: 772
From: Bartlett, IL, USA
Joined: 12-27-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 226 of 238 (287699)
02-17-2006 2:21 PM 		Reply to: Message 221 by Evopeach
02-17-2006 11:15 AM

Re: Of course observation comes first
I was watching some energy and mass interchange in my back yard and the idea that sunlight made it possible for me to see led me to E=mc**2
​
acutally evopeach I'm pretty sure that one of the things Einstein was trying to explain was the observed curvature of light. So yes, the theory of general relativity came about due to observatiions that clashed with newtonian mechanics.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 221 by Evopeach, posted 02-17-2006 11:15 AM Evopeach has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 227 by Evopeach, posted 02-17-2006 2:52 PM SuperNintendo Chalmers has replied
SuperNintendo Chalmers
Member (Idle past 6131 days)
Posts: 772
From: Bartlett, IL, USA
Joined: 12-27-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 229 of 238 (287734)
02-17-2006 3:26 PM 		Reply to: Message 227 by Evopeach
02-17-2006 2:52 PM

Einstein - off topic
Actually I found out that Einstein based his theory on a MUCH simpler observation: That all motion is relative.
​
If a body next to you appears to be in motion, it could be you are still (in the larger picture this is rather a remote possibility) and the other is moving, or it is still and you are moving, or (the usual case) you are both in motion; thus, all motion is relative.
​
http://www.blupete.com/...e/Biographies/Science/Einstein.htm
This message is a reply to:
 Message 227 by Evopeach, posted 02-17-2006 2:52 PM Evopeach has not replied
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2025