Quality Control the Gold Standard

So, how is machine code like self raplicating molecules? The error routines for operatins systems check data integrety, yes. It even has some error correcting. However, right now, the O/S code does not write itself. You are making a bad analogy there.O/S Code is not self replicating itself. It is not writing itself. There lies the difference.

And with incredible lies and misinformation too.For example, Gish still uses the 'footprints' at paluxy river, even though it has been demonstrated to be totally and absolutely false. It is so false that even "Answers in Genesis" says not to use it.His booklet still claims that the 'precambian' is void of fossils, yet, that has been proven to be totally false.Gish admits that the 'moon dust' arguement is wrong, yet, still includes that in the pamphlets he is selling. This is patently false.The Institute of Creation research is still been pushing the falsified
concept of the magnetic field degrading.So many inaccuracies.. so little time. .. and not only that, inaccuracies that keep on being repeated long after the evidence is presented that it is wrong..

No, I am not a liar.From what I see, the Moon dust arguement was used recently by people who pointed to the IRC. An article current on their web site is
The Institute for Creation Research(Hum.. do you really know what they say)THe precamion DOES have fossil evidnece in it. No, it is not complex inevertibrates, but no one said it is. The ICR said NO fossil evidence, and that is a plain lie.The IRC lies and misrepresnts many many things.I mean, they are still using the magnetic field lie
(see The Institute for Creation Research)And, as for the footprints, they don't admit it was wrong, but they will admit that 'it is improper to use it at this time'. They also imply a 'conspiracy' to show it isn't valid.The Institute for Creation Research