Neither a theist nor an atheist

Or not. And unless and until you check it out against the evidence, how can you know which? Which would be great if the world conformed to our ideas of what is "reasonable". If science has taught us one thing, it's that it doesn't. To use your "intuition" to decide what's "reasonable" and then not put it to the test of experience is the quickest and surest way to close your mind.

What do you want "reasonable" to mean? Even if we grant the proposition that "something is either reasonable or it is not", we do have different ideas of what is reasonable. And it is with ideas that intuition supplies us.Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

So the statement "Dr A is wearing a green hat", for example, would be reasonable, because there is a reason why it could happen, but false because I am not actually wearing a green hat?Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

I'm not sure how broad you intend this criterion to be. After all, there is a sense in which I might find a doorway to a magic world in the back of my wardrobe: it is a logical possibility.

Why not? After all, magic is just something that would be against the laws of our universe. They might be just as astonished by electricity as we are by their magic lamps and flying carpets.Anyway, this aside, it's still hard to see just what you mean by "reasonable".Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

I sha'n't quibble over what you want to call it, if I saw a fairy godmother turning a pumpkin into a coach I'd call it "magic", if you want to call it something else that's fair enough.Let's get back to what you mean by "reasonable".