Would you like me to go back and quote you every time you referred to Romney leading a gang of boys to assault another boy as "something from 40 years ago"? Even now, you refuse to acknowledge it for what it was. You continue to insist on referring to it as "something from 40 years ago", which gives the impression that it was just an every day thing like taking a walk in the park or drinking out of the drinking fountain. It was something from 40 years ago. How many of us remember just any regular ole something from 40 years ago?
The point I'm trying to make is you're using a tactic most often used by people who lack empathy. The tactic is pretty simple, actually. Don't specifically refer to things you're talking about. Instead, use a general term. So, if it's rape you're talking about, say it was a personal dispute. If it was a drunk driver plowing into a car killing a family of 5, call it a traffic accident. If it was a gang assault, call it a prank or "something". Heck, I'll do you a favor by violating godwin's law here by pointing out that top nazi officials called systematically exterminating millions of jews "statistics".
This is a strawman argument and and irrelevant conclusion, Taz.
Are you denying what happened isn't something that happened 40* years ago?
Can you point out where I ever mentioned rape, let alone anything on how I referance rape?
Can you quote me where I ever denied what took place?
You appear incapable of doing anything but commiting ad homminum attacks.
Kindly remove your head from your rectum and come back when you can act the part of an adult.
Yeah yeah yeah, I said I was done. This will be my last post. You win. I can't be as hard headed as you are.
We'll see..
™ Version 4.2
(1)