|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Well this is awkward... Used to be a YEC | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
mike the wiz Member Posts: 4755 From: u.k Joined: |
Good question, also a massive question mate, including the problem of evil, dissecting the different religions etc......I made a topic for "good designs", your question is a vast one, so I could only talk/explain about good designs. But look at some other topics, I have hit on some of the differences.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member (Idle past 95 days) Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
Well let's put aside wider questions like good and evil etc. Let's just focus on the design question posed in this thread.
You say good design is indicative of a designer. So what sort of bad design would be present in the absence of such a designer? Do you think (for example) the human body is an example of good design? What would a badly designed (or undesigned) equivalent look like? What would the world look like if there was no intelligent design in your view?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 423 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Again Mike, you simply misrepresent my position.
I start with the evidence that life exists. I have no position on whether or not there is some designer. I look at the evidence. The evidence shows natural causes. So far not one single un-natural cause has ever been found. If you present evidence of some un-natural cause then I will consider that evidence and if the evidence for your un-natural cause is sufficient then I will change my position.Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
bluegenes Member (Idle past 2506 days) Posts: 3119 From: U.K. Joined:
|
Buzsaw writes: That's why science loves relativity and quantum. That's why science shuns logic, common sense and objectivity. Too many whys remain un-asked and un-told by science. For examples, science sweeps under the rug, the whys of the zero/singularity event, the whys of before space/time existed, the logics of how life, managed to manage biogenesis through the early stages of emergence from chaotic soup to amazingly complex life systems, the whys of the fact that all recorded historical cultures have been religious, the whys their assumption of uniformitarion expansion all the way down through the billions of alleged years from the alleged singularity, the whys of the alleged extension of all dinosaurs, all the while, the survival of the other species, etc, etc, etc......... The difference between a scientific approach to reality and yours, Buzsaw, is that scientists will certainly ask questions about things that are unknown, but until they have good answers, they will say "we don't yet know or understand such and such". They will make all the observations they can, they will hypothesise, they will try to extend their knowledge but, unlike you, they will not make up subjective, emotion-based, desire-filled, fantasy answers.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tangle Member Posts: 9514 From: UK Joined: Member Rating: 4.8
|
You have all this the wrong way around. Science - and particularly ToE - says nothing at all about God or creation. It does not have an atheistic position that it's trying to prove. It's only concerned with how organisms have changed over time. It looks at the evidence it finds in nature and forms conclusions that can be tested.
The scientists that originally examined Darwin's hypothesis were creationists themselves, it took many years to be generally accepted as a scientific fact - it won through very much against the prevailing wisdom and beliefs of the times.
Science should stick to what it can prove, not what it can't in the least. It should and it does exactly that. Any scientist tried to do anything else he'd be laughed out of the profession.
Now breathing in oxygen and out carbon dioxide, that's fine, science can handle that as such things are factually experimentally shown to be parsimonious without God, they are not show to be caused without God. I'm afraid you can't pick and choose the bits of science you like and restrict scientists to those - it just doesn't work that way.....You never know, by studying the things you feel uncomfortable about they may even prove you right.Life, don't talk to me about life.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NoNukes Inactive Member
|
You have all this the wrong way around. Science - and particularly ToE - says nothing at all about God or creation. It does not have an atheistic position that it's trying to prove I wouldn't limit this to particularly the theory of evolution. Geologists, astronomers, paleontologists, electrical engineers, as well as biologists as a group have no goals directed towards saying anything about God. The idea that that the typical scientist isn't just trying to do their his or her job of finding oil, trying to make semiconductor devices work, studying the cosmos, etc. seems akin to paranoia to me. It's not science's fault or issue that a sizeable minority of people hold contrary, unscientific religious beliefs. If science fails to be neutral to religion, it is in the same way that journalists are not neutral to astrology when they report events that are contrary to horoscopes. I wonder what the non-quantum theory, religion friendly explanation for how zener diodes and transistor devices work might be, and when we might see new semiconductor devices that use the principle behind this explanation.Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. The proper place to-day, the only place which Massachusetts has provided for her freer and less desponding spirits, is in her prisons, to be put out and locked out of the State by her own act, as they have already put themselves out by their principles. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rahvin Member Posts: 4046 Joined: Member Rating: 7.6 |
It's not science's fault or issue that a sizeable minority of people hold contrary, unscientific religious beliefs. Your optimism vastly exceeds my own.The human understanding when it has once adopted an opinion (either as being the received opinion or as being agreeable to itself) draws all things else to support and agree with it. - Francis Bacon "There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs." - John Rogers
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Buzsaw Inactive Member |
bluegenes writes: Buzsaw writes:
quote: The difference between a scientific approach to reality and yours, Buzsaw, is that scientists will certainly ask questions about things that are unknown, but until they have good answers, they will say "we don't yet know or understand such and such". They will make all the observations they can, they will hypothesise, they will try to extend their knowledge but, unlike you, they will not make up subjective, emotion-based, desire-filled, fantasy answers. Like science's reluctance to falsify cited research and evidence of the Exodus crossing? Like science's reluctance to any consideration of observable fulfilled ancient Biblical prophecies relative to ID? Like science's aversion towards asking questions or studies on anything depicting what is considered on tiny planet earth as the supernatural What is invisible to humans and considered supernatural by tiny earthlings, is likely common in the Universe at large. The evidence of some phenomena observable on earth attests to the need for science to extend the scope of their research. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW. The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future. Someone wisely said something ;ike, "Before fooling with a fool, make sure the fool is a fool."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 423 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined:
|
Please provide a link to a post where you presented any evidence of any Exodus crossing.
Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1496 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
Not to join the pile-up, but I'm always surprised by people who claim that science doesn't have an explanation for something, when its obvious that the scope and boundaries of science is something they have no knowledge of.
Buz, are you sure that science makes no study of the Big Bang singularity? Are you aware that the Large Hadron Collider exists to study that exact phenomenon? Are you sure that there's no scientific study of abiogenesis? Any freshman text on genetics written since 2003 should make mention of the "RNA world" model which explains how you can bootstrap evolutionary genetics with RNA, which we now know has both the self-replicating properties of DNA and the enzymatic activity of proteins.
the whys of the alleged extension of all dinosaurs "Extension" of the dinosaurs? Did you mean "extinction"? And why do you think that science doesn't grapple with the extinction of the dinosaurs? The Alverezes (father and son) famously proposed that an asteroid impact devastated the Earth's biosphere, causing the extinction of megafaunal species. This proposal was supported by the high concentrations of extraterrestrial iridium in K-T sediments, and was ultimately confirmed by the discovery of the Chicxulub impact crater. So, again - are these things that science has no explanation for, or are these things that science has explanations for that you just hadn't heard about? What's your science background, Buz? What classes have you taken? Or are you just trying to wing it based on creationist books you've read and what we've patiently tried to explain to you over the years?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Omnivorous Member Posts: 3991 From: Adirondackia Joined: Member Rating: 6.9
|
Buz writes: Like science's aversion towards asking questions or studies on anything depicting what is considered on tiny planet earth as the supernatural I'd dearly love to study supernatural things on this tiny li'l planet. Could you show me some?"If you can keep your head while those around you are losing theirs, you can collect a lot of heads."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NoNukes Inactive Member |
It's not science's fault or issue that a sizeable minority of people hold contrary, unscientific religious beliefs.
Your optimism vastly exceeds my own.[/qs] While many people hold unscientific beliefs, only a few special people believe that quantum mechanics is a conspiracy against God. Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. The proper place to-day, the only place which Massachusetts has provided for her freer and less desponding spirits, is in her prisons, to be put out and locked out of the State by her own act, as they have already put themselves out by their principles. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Buzsaw Inactive Member |
crashfrog writes: Not to join the pile-up, but I'm always surprised by people who claim that science doesn't have an explanation for something, when its obvious that the scope and boundaries of science is something they have no knowledge of.Buz, are you sure that science makes no study of the Big Bang singularity? Are you aware that the Large Hadron Collider exists to study that exact phenomenon? Are you sure that there's no scientific study of abiogenesis? Any freshman text on genetics written since 2003 should make mention of the "RNA world" model which explains how you can bootstrap evolutionary genetics with RNA, which we now know has both the self-replicating properties of DNA and the enzymatic activity of proteins. the whys of the alleged extension of all dinosaurs "Extension" of the dinosaurs? Did you mean "extinction"? And why do you think that science doesn't grapple with the extinction of the dinosaurs? The Alverezes (father and son) famously proposed that an asteroid impact devastated the Earth's biosphere, causing the extinction of megafaunal species. This proposal was supported by the high concentrations of extraterrestrial iridium in K-T sediments, and was ultimately confirmed by the discovery of the Chicxulub impact crater. So, again - are these things that science has no explanation for, or are these things that science has explanations for that you just hadn't heard about? What's your science background, Buz? What classes have you taken? Or are you just trying to wing it based on creationist books you've read and what we've patiently tried to explain to you over the years? Studies, studies and more studies, relativity, quantum theory, uniformity assumptions. That's it for science. That's where the money, the peers and the secularism is. The logic, the common sense, the the real here and now observable, the cultural the recorded historical, etc all attest to supportive evidence of an intelligent designer. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW. The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future. Someone wisely said something ;ike, "Before fooling with a fool, make sure the fool is a fool."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Buzsaw Inactive Member |
Omnivorous writes: I'd dearly love to study supernatural things on this tiny li'l planet. Could you show me some? Go to the archives. I've been showing real time observable supportive evidence for over 8 years what secularistic minded scientists ignore. Go read and figure. I can lead you to the water but I can't make you drink. BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW. The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future. Someone wisely said something ;ike, "Before fooling with a fool, make sure the fool is a fool."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DrJones* Member Posts: 2290 From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Joined: Member Rating: 6.9
|
Studies, studies and more studies, relativity, quantum theory, uniformity assumptions. That's it for science. That's where the money, the peers and the secularism is.
Its where the results are Buz. Science sent us to The Moon, gave us multiple technologies and advances. Your "intelligent designer" didn't produce the internet, science did.God separated the races and attempting to mix them is like attempting to mix water with diesel fuel.- Buzsaw Message 177 It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in mindssoon I discovered that this rock thing was true Jerry Lee Lewis was the devil Jesus was an architect previous to his career as a prophet All of a sudden i found myself in love with the world And so there was only one thing I could do Was ding a ding dang my dang along ling long - Jesus Built my Hotrod Ministry Live every week like it's Shark Week! - Tracey Jordan Just a monkey in a long line of kings. - Matthew Good If "elitist" just means "not the dumbest motherfucker in the room", I'll be an elitist! - Get Your War On *not an actual doctor
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024