Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,910 Year: 4,167/9,624 Month: 1,038/974 Week: 365/286 Day: 8/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Raising Standards
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 192 of 264 (478050)
08-11-2008 10:16 AM
Reply to: Message 190 by brendatucker
08-11-2008 8:53 AM


Re: A messenger to help clarify theosophy
brenda writes:
I was terribly disappointed when I didn't even make a dent in the consciousness of people by the year 2000, and now with it being 2008, I feel foolish for having tried to make theosophy more publicly known as if I was the messenger referred to. I should retract everything I said about being a messenger that could help clarify theosophy - except, let me ask: Did it help you?
Brenda, what does the above tell you? It seems pretty clear that you strongly beleived something that was infact false. This is the problem when we don't have any corroborating evidence.
If I was to tell you that when people 'worry' they worry in a verbal way i.e. thinking thoughts such as "what if.....?" would you beleive me? If I was to tell you that 'worry' is always about the future rather than the past would you beleive me?
Some people would say I'm right and some would say I'm wrong: but the only way to know for sure is to find out. That takes a measured scientific methodology.
You can't pull ideas out of the ether and expect other people to beleive you without showing with evidence why your ideas are correct.
I'm sorry you spent 25 years chasing rainbows.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 190 by brendatucker, posted 08-11-2008 8:53 AM brendatucker has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 194 by brendatucker, posted 08-18-2008 10:52 AM Larni has replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 196 of 264 (478599)
08-18-2008 11:52 AM
Reply to: Message 193 by brendatucker
08-18-2008 10:50 AM


Re: Self Reflection (but no progress).
Brenda, I'm right in thinking you have a degree in psychology, right?
I just bet you loved psychodynamic theory didn't you? What you just wrote is just the kind thing my psychodynamic professor used to come out with.
All of it does not matter. You are still in the position of having an idea in your head of how the world works that has failed to be accepted in the mainstream because it has no supporting evidence.
A bit like psychoanalytical theory, really.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 193 by brendatucker, posted 08-18-2008 10:50 AM brendatucker has not replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 198 of 264 (478647)
08-19-2008 4:22 AM
Reply to: Message 194 by brendatucker
08-18-2008 10:52 AM


Re: A messenger to help clarify theosophy
brenda writes:
If people could hear these ideas that are found in books currently shuffled out of consideration, would we be better able to make choices concerning whether or not religion is a good thing in life?
The ideas contanined in The Secret Doctrine are rubbish ideas.
No one wants to waste valuable educational time on rubbish now, do they?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 194 by brendatucker, posted 08-18-2008 10:52 AM brendatucker has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 199 by brendatucker, posted 08-20-2008 1:31 AM Larni has replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 200 of 264 (478736)
08-20-2008 6:24 AM
Reply to: Message 199 by brendatucker
08-20-2008 1:31 AM


Too beyond, already.
Okay. Lets do this systematically:
a higher kingdom is penetrating into your thinking - or my thinking - or anyone's thinking and we find out that they want to stay. They are not visiting. They want to make your body and mind their habitat until they can gain in "gravity" enough to make the changes that would produce their form out of ours.
This is only an opinion: there is absolutley no evidence for this assertion, is there?
By being in close association with us, they begin to feel more alive - or who can guess what is threatening them on this cyclical turning that forces them into seeking "further ground?"
The verasity of this statement all hangs on the assumption that the 'Kingdom' theory is true. Again, we cannot simply assume something is true. We must has evidence.
When you say "who can guess..." you could 'guess' just about anything, with no good reason because of the evidence problem you have (see above).
Let's say you are experiencing this and you are quite accustomed to addressing them (as I have long practiced decrees with which I "pray" or ask for energies to be dispersed. As the decrees are written, I often took time to speak them out loud or "mentally.") and so now without those decrees because we have set the books down, we (either you or I or anyone, Joe Dohn, for example, wish to engage this higher kingdom.
So I can take it you are talking to 'them' in the same way that xians 'talk' to their god?
This really damages your credibility; you are asking us to assume that there is a 'them' that can be communicated with (again without any evidence).
This is why some posters here think you are off the wall.
You don't want to begin making use of the girasas kingdom in some way until you have informed enough others that this is what you are doing. For instance, the results that we achieve after contact can only be reported if we have laid the foundation where people can understand what it is we are discussing....."
And here is the crux of the matter: you will NEVER get these ideas off the ground because they have absolutly no evidence appart from you asserting that for you they seem to do the trick in a confusing world.
.....and describing as having occurred,
Again the problem is that you have no evidence that anything has occured.
So I first want to know if I can get time off from involvement with them to be a good mother.
Be a good mum. The rest can wait.
I guess I should get to know the exact girasas I am working with as opposed to the others who may have a variety of talents.
This (and the rest of you post) implies you are personifying the girasas. Does this mean you are have auditoru hallucinations?
Within the "I AM" Temple, there are a myriad of figures with names and positions, however I'm not sure if I should ask for one of those with whom I am familiar due to them having current positions within another structure. Is it still so fluid (5th race is not a "paired" "binding" relationship) that I can pick and choose for just one task and then turn to a new figure to accomplish the next step?
No idea what all this means.
You have to understand that I keep looking for miracles to happen, for light to burst through me somehow and cause an occurrence and then if it does, how can I document it and record it?
But it hasn't, has it? Ask you self why.
I remember my children's classes spending quite a bit of time on their adventures onto Mars - in space camp and in the classroom they would imagine themselves colonizing and setting up research stations on Mars. What's the difference?
They are kids imagining something plausable.
You are an adult with (frankly it's the only way I can describe it) delusions.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 199 by brendatucker, posted 08-20-2008 1:31 AM brendatucker has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 203 by brendatucker, posted 08-20-2008 1:25 PM Larni has replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 202 of 264 (478748)
08-20-2008 12:33 PM
Reply to: Message 201 by Archer Opteryx
08-20-2008 7:19 AM


Hey Archer: are you replying to me?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 201 by Archer Opteryx, posted 08-20-2008 7:19 AM Archer Opteryx has not replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 206 of 264 (478762)
08-20-2008 4:11 PM
Reply to: Message 203 by brendatucker
08-20-2008 1:25 PM


Re: Beyond debate maybe
If a girasas kingdom is making contact with a group of humans, we could identify the group. And IF THEY ARE MAKING CONTACT BY WRITING BOOKS FOR US TO READ, we could identify the books.
But you have no reason to beleive this is true other than it 'feels' right to you. As far as I'm concerned what you think is not real.
But keep in mind, that the process began with one man: Jesus Christ and it will not make a presentation en masse until the time is right.
Well, you will get no where with scientists if you start bringing Jesus as divine the equation. You are shooting yourself in the foot, here.
...but if you can reason with yourself why it is occurring this way, perhaps you can lift your strict definition of evidence in order to benefit from the few people who do experience something unique.
I can do that.
YOU
BELIEVE
WITHOUT
EVIDENCE
This is a delusion.
There are still people channeling masters.
Where?
Lets say one person is showing some remarkable abilities, then the others who do not have the abilities study, record, and otherwise investigate the occurrences to the best of their ability.
If you make that person James Randi you could make $1,000,000!! Go for it!
Astronauts, for example, are a rare and limited group of individuals. Those who have gone into space on rockets and are still alive are a finite number, considerably smaller than the number of humans alive today. When we study a girasas kingdom and its descent we are approaching a similar prospect to the study of the astronaut.
Bzzt...hmmmmm...cacha...zrrt...does not compute.
The evidence is in the work that this person has done and what they claim is happening to them.
Identify this person and his/her claims, please.
Rather than scientists debating religious,...
Scientists don't debate religious.
we could have scientists inducing conditions in religious for study and these scientists could be asking big questions for the purpose of producing a more even and tempered descent rather than allowing it to occur haphazard, scattered, and under duress.
Yes; it would be great if scientist where overseeing the metamorphosis of humanity wouldn't it?
By the scientist being by the side of the religious person, we are offering them a safe protection, a guiding hand, and a voice of reason. The two could make a great investigative team.
Well I like to kid myself that I'm a scientist (since I'm enagaged in active research) and I often work with patients who have beliefs that bring harm to them.
What I always say to people who will not alter their religious beliefs is "go talk to a vicar".

This message is a reply to:
 Message 203 by brendatucker, posted 08-20-2008 1:25 PM brendatucker has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 208 by brendatucker, posted 08-20-2008 6:24 PM Larni has replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 209 of 264 (478831)
08-21-2008 4:07 AM
Reply to: Message 208 by brendatucker
08-20-2008 6:24 PM


Re: Beyond debate maybe
I expect that you do not have much fun engaging in this debate because you have very little regard for the truth that people claim to exist in religious books and lifestyles.
Au contrare. If I had no fun on this site I would not be at this site talking to you, would I?
Now, before we go on I would like to point out that you have addressed none of my points; specifically that you have NO EVIDENCE that the 'Seven Race Theory' has any basis in reality.
I also want to draw your attention to the following phrases that you used in the last post to me:
Now I still do not have a concensus on what we can consider to be human.
If we suggest that humans were within dinosaurs...
...a series of metamorphoses occurred of which we know very little...
These all indicate that your 'theory' is woefully underdeveloped. I would put your 'theory' as an unfalsifiable hypothesis.
I'm going to make a very important point here: if you honestly want to promogulate this to the world at large you must understand this point; I can't stress how important this will be for you.
Your 'Seven Race Theory' needs to be falsifiable before any scientist will even touch it with somebody elses barge pole.
The rest of your posting on this site will be essentially pointless untill you can at least show how your theory can be falsified.
Come up with a falsification method and I'm very happy to continue this discussion.
If you refuse, then no scientist on earth will react to the 'Seven Race Theory' differently to me and your mission is doomed.
Think of this as an opportunity to show everyone reading this thread (there may be as many as 8) that you can work with science!
Otherwise you will be chasing rainbows untill you go bonkers.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 208 by brendatucker, posted 08-20-2008 6:24 PM brendatucker has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 210 by brendatucker, posted 08-21-2008 11:17 AM Larni has replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 211 of 264 (478852)
08-21-2008 12:41 PM
Reply to: Message 210 by brendatucker
08-21-2008 11:17 AM


Re: Why me?
That's a good question: why me?
You are right that anyone could do what you are suggesting, too.
But back to the 'why me' question: when you teach your children that they must put in effort to get rewards and they whine "why can't you do it, why me?", do you say, "don't worry little one, I will do the job for you" or do you say "in life you need to work for what you want so you must learn to do things for yourself?"
If you want to change the world you must put the effort in; no one is going to do it for you.
If you have put the effort in and still have no results you must question your methods or your competances.
You seem to want to help people marry religion and science into a workable whole: this is not posible because science does not deal with anything that does not have evidence.
Now and again: the issue still remains that you have not falsified the seven race 'theory' (more of a hypothesis because you are saying "this is how I think the world works").
The problem is you are saying "this is how I think the world works but no one beleives me. Will someone please champion my case but I will undertake no action to convince you of why I beileve that this is how the world works?".
How can you reasonably expect anyone to want to champion your cause when you yourself cannot?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 210 by brendatucker, posted 08-21-2008 11:17 AM brendatucker has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 212 by brendatucker, posted 08-21-2008 12:50 PM Larni has replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 215 of 264 (478864)
08-21-2008 1:54 PM
Reply to: Message 213 by brendatucker
08-21-2008 1:13 PM


Re: At least . . . .
I don't know why Darwin's work can be accepted immediately and Blavatsky's can be so ridiculed and shunned, taunted, and debased.
Are you serious? You can't understand why? Darwins's work uses evidence. HPB has no evidence at all. How can it be any clearer?
Just because science has standards doesn't make it right to become so derogative about what someone else has encountered in their life.
True. There is no reason for anyone to be rude, but if an adult beleives in Father Christmas you would call them a moron with good cause. The seven race theory has no more validity that Father Chrismas, the Tooth Fairy, Yaweh, Vishnu or any other imaginary character.
But remember, Jesus Christ was killed. He was different and people didn't trust him to help them (all of them) and his existence was interrupted.
So you say. But that does not make it so. If Jesus was real he was a normal person (probably schizophrenic, to boot). You are starting with an assumption that xian beleifs are facts and this is not true. There is no evidence for xiantity out side the books arbitrarily deem cannon.
It seems one of you salient point is that the seven race theory bridges the gap between xianity and science and that this is valuable: not so! Xians won't go with heresy (your views from their perspective) and for scientist it is a non issue.
You have one of two choices:
1) accept that religious people are too happy with their current world view to want to change (they see no conflict with science at all) and scientist see no need to concider religion at all (because it has nothing to do with science- what scientist do). Both groups have no hang ups with religion/science because it is like oil and water- the don't mix and people are happiest that way.
2) keep banging your head against a brick wall trying to convince people that there is a problem and thsat you have the solution. There is no problem!
Maybe people as a whole will be just as happy to prevent a girasas kingdom from "landing" on earth. Maybe we will all vote to do away with them and struggle on by ourselves.
You make a masive assumption here, don't you? You have assumed that you are right about the seven race theory awith bsolutely no evidence! That is why you get no where with people- because you say "I've assumed this is true. You must beleive me based on my assumption. I won't tell you why I beleive it is true, however".
Maybe initiatives will be instituted to cause them harm so that they cannot make their way through us.
In my professional experience in mental health people are only institutionalised if they are a danger to themselves or others. Walk around with a plaquard all you like but as long as you are not a danger you won't get locked up.
That would be one result that we would have to live with, but then surely these people who want to prevent them having a role in our lives will try to understand that some of us may be helpless when it comes to rising up against them. If they are a higher kingdom, how can we be to blame for what they do to us?
No idea what you mean, sorry.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 213 by brendatucker, posted 08-21-2008 1:13 PM brendatucker has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 221 by brendatucker, posted 08-21-2008 2:16 PM Larni has not replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 216 of 264 (478865)
08-21-2008 2:04 PM
Reply to: Message 212 by brendatucker
08-21-2008 12:50 PM


Re: Why me?
400,000 years before beginning of sixth race may or may not be substantiated within the literature.
You don't substantiate anything with literature, you use evidence.
People are really against the idea of permitting vegetarianism to become anything more than a few misguided seekers.
Not so, my fiance is a veggie, most of my friends are and I only eat meat when we eat out so you point fails.
Do you think there is allowance for those who don't quite fit in because they have dreams and aspirations towards this "meeting of a higher kingdom?"
Dream away! But be under no illusion that science will never take dreams seriously (unless it is a flux capacitor, obviously) unless you back it up with evidence.
You are asking people to beleive in the ramblings of a possibly disturbed 19th century writer. What would you say to some body trying to tell you that Cthulu is real?
I cringe at what my son makes out with for his diet at school.
What ever you do, please don't push your seven race theory on your kids. I've seen too many young people fucked up by what their parent tell them.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 212 by brendatucker, posted 08-21-2008 12:50 PM brendatucker has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 218 by brendatucker, posted 08-21-2008 2:10 PM Larni has replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 219 of 264 (478868)
08-21-2008 2:14 PM
Reply to: Message 217 by brendatucker
08-21-2008 2:07 PM


Re: Christianity
Christianity has been in existence for a long time and this theory can be successfully tied in with Christian records.
No it can't. Prove it.
ABE: what about the Sumerian pantheon? Shintoism? Druidism? Wicca? Norse Pantheon?
Edited by Larni, : Just adding stuff, you know?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 217 by brendatucker, posted 08-21-2008 2:07 PM brendatucker has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 222 by brendatucker, posted 08-21-2008 2:20 PM Larni has not replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 223 of 264 (478872)
08-21-2008 2:22 PM
Reply to: Message 218 by brendatucker
08-21-2008 2:10 PM


Re: Why me?
I found the theory. I communicated the theory. If more people could hear about this new development, then the work that you so adamantly advocate could be done.
Point one: You found a hypothesis not a theory.
Point two: In all the time you have been promogulating this hypothesis you have found nobody who cares! You said that you thought you were the one destined to spread the word and are a bit stumpt as to why no one listened by 2000: what does that tell you?
Point 3: The more people you tell the more people you will convince that you are deluded: trust me.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 218 by brendatucker, posted 08-21-2008 2:10 PM brendatucker has not replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 229 of 264 (478928)
08-22-2008 3:54 AM
Reply to: Message 227 by brendatucker
08-21-2008 2:56 PM


Re: Christianity
Do you see how elements of truth can be revealed through many individuals, even those who are not smart or are not accomplished?
If you could point out where this ahs happened I would be obliged.
...kindnesses, counsel, promptings that make them act extraordinary.
On a personal level sure. But not on a scientific level.
I tried to answer you, but you didn't see any difference between a world religion and a fictional story.
This is why scientist will have no part of the seven race theory. For the same reason they have no part of religion. To somebody who is not religious [b]all religions are fiction[/qs]. That's why you get nowhere with your mission.
Do you understand?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 227 by brendatucker, posted 08-21-2008 2:56 PM brendatucker has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 232 by brendatucker, posted 08-25-2008 3:13 PM Larni has not replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 230 of 264 (478929)
08-22-2008 4:00 AM
Reply to: Message 228 by brendatucker
08-21-2008 3:01 PM


Re: Why me?
It's not an everyday event that we have a challenger for Darwin.
Rubbish. Darwin attackers are two a penny. Check out this thread on this very site which I assure you is very current.
http://EvC Forum: Status Report: The Invulnerable Refutation of Darwinism -->EvC Forum: Status Report: The Invulnerable Refutation of Darwinism
Take some time to read through and please take note how the posters on this thread are bending over backwards to see your point of view in the politest of ways.
See what happens to other people who insist they are right without presenting evidence.
You are relatively new here so some of us feel there could be some point in persuading you to think in a more open minded way.
You don't want to end up like Ray, a frothing bitter loon.
Then it becomes a problem of finding out whether or not there are Christian organizations or scientists who can make use of any of it. Maybe they can and maybe they can't. We shall see.
You have already seen!!! The xians call you heretic and scientist don't pay your ideas any attention. How many more years will you waste on your failed, doomed mission?
Edited by Larni, : More stuff...it's a slow morning.
Edited by Larni, : Slow brain day.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 228 by brendatucker, posted 08-21-2008 3:01 PM brendatucker has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 233 by brendatucker, posted 08-25-2008 3:16 PM Larni has not replied
 Message 234 by brendatucker, posted 08-25-2008 3:39 PM Larni has not replied
 Message 235 by brendatucker, posted 08-25-2008 3:39 PM Larni has replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 236 of 264 (479239)
08-25-2008 4:07 PM
Reply to: Message 235 by brendatucker
08-25-2008 3:39 PM


Re: Why me?
And perhaps you just want me to know that I will be shot down, eh?
Bingo!
You gain nothing with you current life strategy.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 235 by brendatucker, posted 08-25-2008 3:39 PM brendatucker has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 237 by brendatucker, posted 08-25-2008 4:17 PM Larni has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024