Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,915 Year: 4,172/9,624 Month: 1,043/974 Week: 2/368 Day: 2/11 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Raising Standards
Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3976
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 2 of 264 (473100)
06-27-2008 12:48 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by brendatucker
06-26-2008 6:38 PM


Your point is?
I went so far as to print out your message and sit down with a highlighter pen to try to determine your topic's theme. I never found it.
So, what is your intended debate theme?
Adminnemooseus

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by brendatucker, posted 06-26-2008 6:38 PM brendatucker has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by brendatucker, posted 06-27-2008 4:35 PM Adminnemooseus has replied

  
Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3976
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 4 of 264 (473236)
06-27-2008 9:08 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by brendatucker
06-27-2008 4:35 PM


evcforum.net's new topic standards
For someone concerned about raising standards, you sure put out a muddled message 1. It's pretty much gibberish to me. As presented, it is not meeting forum standards (and they're not that rigorous) and is not going to get promoted to open debate.
Perhaps another admin feels differently about it.
Adminnemooseus

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by brendatucker, posted 06-27-2008 4:35 PM brendatucker has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by brendatucker, posted 06-28-2008 1:33 AM Adminnemooseus has replied

  
Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3976
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 6 of 264 (473414)
06-29-2008 2:38 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by brendatucker
06-28-2008 1:33 AM


Where's the new evolution hypothesis?
How do you suggest I go about accomplishing this monstrous job of showing you a replacement for Darwin?
If you have a new hypothesis of biological evolution buried somewhere in your messages, I sure haven't found it.
If it's in the books etc. you have cited, that's not good enough to start a new topic. You need to bring some sort of begining sumary of the hypothesis into your message. In other words, you can cite the references as sources, but we need to have some material of the hypothesis as text right in your opening message.
Please post such as a new message in this topic. It can be as a reply to this message.
Adminnemooseus

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by brendatucker, posted 06-28-2008 1:33 AM brendatucker has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by brendatucker, posted 06-29-2008 9:19 AM Adminnemooseus has replied

  
Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3976
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 8 of 264 (473488)
06-30-2008 3:41 AM
Reply to: Message 7 by brendatucker
06-29-2008 9:19 AM


Would you be interested in a 1 on 1 "Great Debate" with Brad McFall?
An example of Brad's writing:
I feel a little stupid because I learnt something- just joking!!
The Wittgentsein folklore did not work on me however because I got a great sense of Copernicus from Gingerich and Poland from an native.
Thanks for the video. It is going to help me with a conversation that my two brothers always have about possible spin experiments.
I DO struggle with making sure I am not making the reverse error Coleman is talking about. It is possible I have made it but I am not sure whether Sidney might consider rejecting Von Neumann as I do over (for me) how he wrote up Cantor’s ordertypes and ALSO told Feynmann to not care about what the government was doing.
The thesis I wrote but what was rejected by Provine wailed against the history of biology for not explaining how vitalism was written out. It just disappeared from the literature tout court. That however is nothing to do with Telsa on electrons etc. I do not see that I need to refer back when vitalism was and J. Loeb had not written. I am struggling rather with Dyson’s claim that we do not have Einstein’s view anymore. This video helps me as I am trying to read comprehensibly Penrose's "Road to reality" while listening to the Feynamnn lectures from the 60s.
I suppose space like seperation could be considered if life off Earth is admitted. Perhaps that causes some issue for me as well. Tesla’s work would all be on Earth however much one wishes (or not) to accept Wolf and Leibniz rather than Kant or some other viewpoint in a chain with Bertrand Russell.
Source
To me, the above makes about as much sense as what you're presenting.
Adminnemooseus

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by brendatucker, posted 06-29-2008 9:19 AM brendatucker has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by brendatucker, posted 06-30-2008 12:13 PM Adminnemooseus has not replied
 Message 10 by brendatucker, posted 06-30-2008 1:09 PM Adminnemooseus has not replied

  
Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3976
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 12 of 264 (473792)
07-02-2008 11:16 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by brendatucker
07-02-2008 11:39 AM


The "buried" theory
Signed, Yours truly, the founder of the "buried" theory
There might be a hypothesis buried somewhere in your previous messages, but I personally wouldn't bet on it.
Your efforts do not meet standards for release into the standard forum sub-forums. I'll release this topic to the "Free For All" and we shall see what happens. I hope Brad takes part.
Adminnemooseus

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by brendatucker, posted 07-02-2008 11:39 AM brendatucker has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by bluegenes, posted 07-02-2008 11:23 PM Adminnemooseus has not replied

  
Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3976
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 13 of 264 (473793)
07-02-2008 11:16 PM


Thread moved here from the Proposed New Topics forum.

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024