Of course you "think" and you "doubt," but do you work?
Yes, I work. What does that have to do with anything?
In order to understand this theory and assess the evidence, you have to read the books.
I got that part. In the meantime, it would be beneficial if you gave us a brief synopsis. I can;t make heads or tails of what you are talking about.
1. There is a book called THE SECRET DOCTRINE containing a version of evolution not talked about in schools and not frequently known of by the general public. FACT
It may also be fact that it's a crock. Have you ever considered that aspect?
Blavatsky wrote THE SECRET DOCTRINE and for some unknown reason, people are slow in discovering "the secret" that is there for us to know. Why? People love puzzles. They love to experiment. It is in our nature. Just because I am capable of presenting the secret to you after membership in the organization since 1975, doesn't make me a giant of the human race. I am a simple human who found the life here to be inviting, stimulating, and purifying. FACT
As in Madam Blavatsky, the charlatan? That might be why no one takes it seriously. You do realize also that she died not all that long after the Origin of Species was written. That being the case, do tell how she revolutionized the theory of evolution with her wide expertise of the field.
While admitting to simple human status, the monumental task of uncovering a theory of evolution that can serve both sides in the debate and bringing this theory into VOGUE is too much for me and I implore you to calculate that if a task of this size presents itself to a simple human, that simple human will produce a dependence upon a great girasas being for guidance and fortitude and if the accomplishment of the task does occur, she (or he) will give credit to God and to this higher kingdom for the occasion, and will view herself as mostly impeding the process (unfortunately). FACT
What are you talking about? You are speaking as if something profound is supposed to smack us in the face. This is just gobbledegook.
I offer this historical occurrence to you, serious debaters that I know you are, because I trust that you will want to know whether or not my claim is worth the time it takes for you to substantiate it.
I think we're all waiting for you to substantiate something. But moreover, we are ever patiently waiting for some semblance of structure. I do apologize but I have no idea what you are talking about. And I know I'm not the only one. You continue to go off on tangents, seemingly attempting to tie one thing to another, but no one knows what you mean. You are too vague.
Does anyone accept this challenge?
I do. My challenge to you is to have people understand what you are talking about.
“Tu ne cede malis sed contra audentior ito"
™ Version 4.2
