Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 0/368 Day: 0/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Hello. I'm a new poster here.
sld
Inactive Member


Message 20 of 43 (2511)
01-19-2002 9:26 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by Cobra_snake
01-18-2002 10:26 AM


quote:
Originally posted by Cobra_snake:
Truth be told, the main reason I am a young-earth creationist is because that is what my parents taught me. I have looked at many of the facts and I am still unconvinced that natural processes alone could account for everything in this world.
However, I am beggining to think that old-earth may be more realistic. I am heavily researching the carbon dating process, and if I can't find any significant flaw in that process, I will likely change to an old-earth Creationist.
I hope I can be a good contribution to the intelligent debate in this forum.

Sure enough, I responded to your post in the separation of church and state forum, and find you over here, a step ahead of me. With all due respect to your parents (I'm sure they are fine wonderful people); unless they are experts in earth science, or at least very well educated in the field, they aren't a good source for your scientific knowledge on the age of the earth. As I stated on my other post, you have a lot of years of study ahead of you. Don't decide right now. Simply put away all thoughts on religion, creationism, evolution, and concentrate on learning as much as you can unfettered by what your parents, ministers, friends, even teachers tell you. It's actually quite a bit of reading but if you are like me, you'll enjoy your studies.
BTW, Talkorigins is a great way to start learning about the great debate. I would suggest reading every single FAQ there.
SLD

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Cobra_snake, posted 01-18-2002 10:26 AM Cobra_snake has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by TrueCreation, posted 01-20-2002 7:09 PM sld has not replied

sld
Inactive Member


Message 28 of 43 (2678)
01-22-2002 11:47 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by TrueCreation
01-19-2002 5:52 PM


[QUOTE]Originally posted by TrueCreation:
[/B][/QUOTE]
Sigh. This is too easy. There is no evidence that decay rates have changed in the slightest since time immemorial. Scientists know of no quantum mechanical way in which they could change. It would be up to you to provide the evidence or mechanism by which decay rates could change over time. But, and here is the key, we have observed ancient decay rates; very very old ones, in fact. And the decay rates are the same. Where have we seen these? In supernovae bursts. Sorry to burst your bubble FalseCreation, but that is solid proof that decay rates haven't changed.
SLD

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by TrueCreation, posted 01-19-2002 5:52 PM TrueCreation has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024