Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,916 Year: 4,173/9,624 Month: 1,044/974 Week: 3/368 Day: 3/11 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Hello. I'm a new poster here.
Loudmouth
Inactive Member


Message 41 of 43 (100035)
04-14-2004 6:26 PM
Reply to: Message 31 by TrueCreation
01-24-2002 11:57 AM


TC,
Can you name one scientist who has looked at the evidence and concluded that the earth is 6,000 years old, a global flood circa 2,000 BCE, and immutable kinds that hasn't first read the Bible? My opinion is that creation science is only meant to find support for a religious presupposition and ignores or distorts falsifying data. Creation science is as much a scientific exploration as looking searching for orc evidence via The Lord of the Rings. Maybe Eden was actually Middle Earth?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by TrueCreation, posted 01-24-2002 11:57 AM TrueCreation has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by SRO2, posted 04-14-2004 6:31 PM Loudmouth has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024