Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,911 Year: 4,168/9,624 Month: 1,039/974 Week: 366/286 Day: 9/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   God: Knowable or not Knowable?
Phat
Member
Posts: 18350
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 4 of 216 (435645)
11-22-2007 8:26 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Jon
11-21-2007 4:04 PM


Catatonic
Has Dr. Adequate been listening to our chat room conversations, Jon?
Note to Lurkers: Jon and I already discussed the symbolism of humans relating to cats as a metaphor for God relating to humans!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Jon, posted 11-21-2007 4:04 PM Jon has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18350
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 10 of 216 (435812)
11-23-2007 3:41 AM
Reply to: Message 9 by Stile
11-22-2007 3:44 PM


Re: From Jar Through Jon?
Stile writes:
The whole point of some religions is that they say God does want the relationship (regardless of how limited it is on his side). I'm not sure how they know that, but certain religions say they do. If God does want the relationship, the human side certainly can be just as fulfilling as any other human relationship. In fact, this relationship could very well be the best-possible relationship any human could ever have.
Well, I wonder if the dog (or cat) would rather hang out with other dogs or with their human master? (If they had a choice)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Stile, posted 11-22-2007 3:44 PM Stile has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by Jon, posted 11-23-2007 3:46 AM Phat has replied
 Message 12 by Stile, posted 11-23-2007 8:49 AM Phat has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18350
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 18 of 216 (436048)
11-24-2007 7:43 AM
Reply to: Message 11 by Jon
11-23-2007 3:46 AM


'Tang is not the penultimate
If I were a dog, I may seek my "own kind" to find 'Tang, but I would prefer hanging out with my Master who could provide me with ample table scraps, scruffy neck rubs, and who even talked to me in the hopes that we could understand each other!!
Edited by Phat, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by Jon, posted 11-23-2007 3:46 AM Jon has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by Jon, posted 11-25-2007 3:19 PM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18350
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 26 of 216 (436411)
11-25-2007 3:59 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by Jon
11-25-2007 3:19 PM


Re: 'Tang is [...] the [...] ultimate
I said: (If I were a Dog)I would prefer hanging out with my Master who could provide me with ample table scraps, scruffy neck rubs
Jonnachi writes:
So, as far as you're concerned, the purpose of your master is to: "provide me with ample table scraps, scruffy neck rubs..."? It's an odd master that serves his subordinates more than they serve him... no?
Indeed. But the dog protects the house, fetches the paper, and does his best to provide a companion to the wife and kids. I like going on morning runs with him, too! (theooretically)
Jon writes:
So, in your experiences with your own pet (bird), you've learned what she likes to eat, when she wants to go in her cage, when she's thirsty, if she's tired... etc. What has your bird learned about you?
First, this analogy is incomplete since unlike God, I am not a conure mind reader. But since you ask, I would say that my bird knows that when she squawks, I will check her food and water. She knows that when I want her to come out of the cage, she has to nip me to let me know she is uninterested. She always makes up by kissing me, though. Hey, she is just a bird, after all!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by Jon, posted 11-25-2007 3:19 PM Jon has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by Jon, posted 11-25-2007 4:17 PM Phat has replied
 Message 30 by nator, posted 11-25-2007 7:55 PM Phat has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18350
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 28 of 216 (436415)
11-25-2007 4:24 PM
Reply to: Message 27 by Jon
11-25-2007 4:17 PM


Re: 'Tang is [...] the [...] ultimate
I see your point. But lets assume that I knw the bird better than even she did. Lets assume that it was irrelevant if she understood how I do the things I do. What is relevant is the love and trust that she gets from me.
Now...if sometime in eons past, I foreknew that her and her cousins needed a sign, IF I were omnipotent, I could send my offspring (which was actually also me) and they would become a bird. Going among the birds, my offspring would spread love and give all the birds hope!
actually, I know this is all rather silly, but I'm cooking lunch right now and not really thinking about this reply......

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by Jon, posted 11-25-2007 4:17 PM Jon has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 29 by Jon, posted 11-25-2007 4:30 PM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18350
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 34 of 216 (436546)
11-26-2007 12:09 PM
Reply to: Message 29 by Jon
11-25-2007 4:30 PM


Jons rehashing of Jars argument about "knowing God"
Yes

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by Jon, posted 11-25-2007 4:30 PM Jon has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by Jon, posted 11-26-2007 2:22 PM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18350
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 36 of 216 (436578)
11-26-2007 4:45 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by Jon
11-26-2007 2:22 PM


Re: Phat and his hash...
Jon writes:
If I am better than you at something, does that indicate a difference between you and me in regards that particular thing? For example, if I am better at soccer than are you, does that indicate a difference between you and me when it comes to soccer?
Sure. You can understand soccer and I cannot as well. I can observe it and watch it, but I can't play it and may not understand all the rules.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by Jon, posted 11-26-2007 2:22 PM Jon has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 38 by Jon, posted 11-27-2007 9:54 AM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18350
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 40 of 216 (436821)
11-27-2007 6:19 PM
Reply to: Message 38 by Jon
11-27-2007 9:54 AM


Re: E-7?
Jonnicus Logicus writes:
Is the limitation of what can be learned reected in the limitation of the relationship? For example, is it true that a less limited relationship exists with an entity about whom you have learned more, but a more limited relationship exists with an entity about whom you have learned less?
Phat thinks a moment...
It appears that if what you are saying is correct, the limitation in the relationship totally depends on my willingness to learn more about the entity with whom I am having the relationship with.
Thus, my answer is yes. Knowing the other person/cat/bird is directly related to the depth of the relationship.
For example, I couldn't just pick up any old bird and have as deep of a relationship as Icarus and I have. (ewwwww, I know! )
I have gotten to know you online wise through a years worth of conversations, and I couldn't simply talk to another lad from Minnesota and have anywhere near the quality of conversation that we sometimes have...(nor anywhere near the arguments!)
Where are you going with this, Jon? Note the title of the thread, now....
Edited by Phat, : fixed wee error

"All that we call human history--money, poverty, ambition, war, prostitution, classes, empires, slavery--[is] the long terrible story of man trying to find something other than God which will make him happy."--C.S.Lewis
* * * * * * * * * *
“The world has achieved brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants.”--General Omar Bradley
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
"The free man owns himself. He can damage himself with either eating or drinking; he can ruin himself with gambling. If he does he is certainly a damn fool, and he might possibly be a damned soul; but if he may not, he is not a free man any more than a dog." -GK Chesterson

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by Jon, posted 11-27-2007 9:54 AM Jon has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 41 by Jon, posted 11-27-2007 6:26 PM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18350
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 42 of 216 (436825)
11-27-2007 6:35 PM
Reply to: Message 41 by Jon
11-27-2007 6:26 PM


Re: E-8?
Jon writes:
Is God innately better than you?
Of course! Thats why He needed Jesus! No way could humans comprehend or even talk to God the Father. (Trinitarian Defense)
[/theobabble]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by Jon, posted 11-27-2007 6:26 PM Jon has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 44 by Jon, posted 11-27-2007 7:14 PM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18350
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 47 of 216 (436922)
11-28-2007 2:51 AM
Reply to: Message 44 by Jon
11-27-2007 7:14 PM


Re: Babbleship sunk...
Jon writes:
  1. Betterness begets difference (Better ’ Different)
    sounds reasonable.
  2. Difference begets limitation of knowing (Different ’ k-Limit)
    By either party?
  3. Limitation of knowing begets limitation of relationship (k-Limit ’ r-Limit)
  4. God has innite betterness (iBetter)
We have established that God is infinitely better. It does not follow that He is infinitely unknowable,however, if by definition He erepresents infinity itself!
Therefore:
  1. Innite betterness begets innite difference (iBetter ’ iDifferent)
    yes, we know!
  2. Innite difference begets innite limitation of knowing (iDifferent ’ ik-Limit)
  3. Innite limitation of knowing begets innite limitation of relationship (ik-Limit ’ ir-Limit)
  4. It is not possible to close an innite gap without changing either party.
    1. We cannot change either party.
      we cant do it on this end...but what of the other end? Can the other party change the situation? Why not?
    2. We cannot possibly close the innite gap.
  5. So we have an innite limit in the possibility of a relationship with God.
    1. Anything innitely limited in its possibility is simply impossible.
    2. It is impossible to have a relationship with God.
  6. It is impossible to have a relationship with God.
phat writes:
I will agree except to assert that it may be possible for God to have an infinite relationship with us. I mean, whats stopping Him?
A. God needs nothing.
Phat writes:
Logical, but would not explain the need for Jesus interacting with humanity.
B. Jesus died nearly 2000 years ago.
Phat writes:
Some believe that He lives today! This is neither provable nor refutable and is thus a belief.
C. Jesus is completely irrelevant.
Phat writes:
IF Jesus is completely irrelevant, that is a belief and not a fact.
Well, I won't challenge you argument that asserts that Jesus is both irrelevant and dead. Thats something that none of can know based on our own investigation. Might it be possible, however, for the other party to inform us?
If I am theobabbling, please consider that I have nothing further to say and that you can consider your argument supportable based on your own chosen belief.
You Sunk My Babbleship!
Edited by Phat, : No reason given.
Edited by Phat, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by Jon, posted 11-27-2007 7:14 PM Jon has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18350
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 50 of 216 (436975)
11-28-2007 10:57 AM
Reply to: Message 49 by Stile
11-28-2007 10:08 AM


Re: I don't think your reasoning flows
Thanks! You said it better than I could!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by Stile, posted 11-28-2007 10:08 AM Stile has seen this message but not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18350
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 68 of 216 (437340)
11-29-2007 6:22 PM
Reply to: Message 66 by Jon
11-29-2007 5:27 PM


Re: G-6?
OK...so putting all this logic stuff aside for a moment, can I ask a simple question?
I think that it is relevant whether or not we humans want to know God or not. I personally talk to Him almost every day and I certainly don't need evidence to support my belief. I have no problem talking...and no problem believing that God is listening. I suppose in conclusion, I can say that whether or not God is knowable is unprovable...and that proof is irrelevant to belief.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by Jon, posted 11-29-2007 5:27 PM Jon has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 70 by Jon, posted 11-29-2007 6:57 PM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18350
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 74 of 216 (437471)
11-30-2007 9:19 AM
Reply to: Message 70 by Jon
11-29-2007 6:57 PM


Re: Time to set the rattle aside
Jon writes:
C'mon, already! You agreed with Stile's points made, so maybe you will want to give me your own rebuttal to what I said in response to Stile. If not, then concede your points.
IF God exists, your logical analysis certainly won't find Him. God finds you....you don't find Him! (No, I can't support it...but I'll be darned if I'm conceding anything! We simply disagree as to the methodology of belief.)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 70 by Jon, posted 11-29-2007 6:57 PM Jon has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 77 by jar, posted 11-30-2007 9:22 AM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18350
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 76 of 216 (437473)
11-30-2007 9:20 AM
Reply to: Message 73 by Stile
11-30-2007 8:58 AM


Re: A few questions.
jar writes:
I can play Frisbee with my dogs, play fetch, have them warn me of visitors or sneaky cats.
I can snuggle with a girlfriend, share jokes, have her get me a soda, share a milkshake with me.
I can walk with friends, hitch a ride when my car is broken, share a fries and cuppa.
Which of those is possible in the relationship you describe as being "the most fulfilling relationship any human is capable of?"
Stile,responding to jar writes:
Looks to me like reality is pretty clear that either an infinite God doesn't exist, or this infinite God doesn't care too much about us.
But I'm not talking about reality, only a hypothetical situation. One that was clearly stated. Or is it your point that even if an infinite God wanted to, they would be unable to be better than your dog, girl/boyfriend or friends? Doesn't sound very infinite...
A Dog, girlfriend, or friend can only do so much. I certainly wouldnt trust my heart and soul to any of them as I would with God. Of course this reflects the fact that my belief presupposes that God is actively involved and concerned about my day to day feelings and actions.

"All that we call human history--money, poverty, ambition, war, prostitution, classes, empires, slavery--[is] the long terrible story of man trying to find something other than God which will make him happy."--C.S.Lewis
* * * * * * * * * *
“The world has achieved brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants.”--General Omar Bradley
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Homer Simpson: Sometimes, Marge, you just have to go with your gut!
Marge: You *always* go with your gut! How about for once you listen to your brain?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by Stile, posted 11-30-2007 8:58 AM Stile has seen this message but not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18350
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 79 of 216 (437479)
11-30-2007 10:00 AM
Reply to: Message 77 by jar
11-30-2007 9:22 AM


Re: Your god is evil Phat
jar writes:
So once again Phat trots out the evil little god Phat created.
::Phat goes into the quotemine...:::
Phil 1:3-6--I thank my God every time I remember you. In all my prayers for all of you, I always pray with joy because of your partnership in the gospel from the first day until now, being confident of this, that he who began a good work in you will carry it on to completion until the day of Christ Jesus.
What that quote means to me (or perhaps what I was taught) is that God began the work in me and that God will finish the work in me.
Whats so evil about that?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 77 by jar, posted 11-30-2007 9:22 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 81 by jar, posted 11-30-2007 10:15 AM Phat has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024