Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   A statement of my disbeliefs
ramoss
Member (Idle past 642 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 08-11-2004


Message 82 of 87 (211547)
05-26-2005 4:21 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by CK
04-25-2005 9:01 AM


I will have to agree also.
However, when it comes to 'finding the god of the torah', I will say that I agree with the Jewish attitude about the rewards of living the 'Good life' is the good life itself, not a mythical afterlife.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by CK, posted 04-25-2005 9:01 AM CK has not replied

  
ramoss
Member (Idle past 642 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 08-11-2004


Message 83 of 87 (211550)
05-26-2005 4:33 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by Namesdan
05-25-2005 2:08 PM


Re: I see no reason
Several things.
Behe's 'Darwin's black box" was not a peer reviewed scietnific article. It basically took several of the problems that were currently being looked at, and said 'It's too complex, it must be an intelligent designer', using the logical fallacy of personal incrdibiltiy.
All the puzzles that were mentioned in Behe's book have been solved BTW.
No intelligent designer needed, and hte concept of 'Irreducable complex' is discredited.
As for those other books, I don't know Patrick GLynn's book, but Lee Strobels books are poorly written rewrites of claims that are thoughly
discredited. Their 'evidence' is not evidence what so ever.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by Namesdan, posted 05-25-2005 2:08 PM Namesdan has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024