Several things.
Behe's 'Darwin's black box" was not a peer reviewed scietnific article. It basically took several of the problems that were currently being looked at, and said 'It's too complex, it must be an intelligent designer', using the logical fallacy of personal incrdibiltiy.
All the puzzles that were mentioned in Behe's book have been solved BTW.
No intelligent designer needed, and hte concept of 'Irreducable complex' is discredited.
As for those other books, I don't know Patrick GLynn's book, but Lee Strobels books are poorly written rewrites of claims that are thoughly
discredited. Their 'evidence' is not evidence what so ever.