Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Animal Intelligence and Evolution/Creation
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 38 of 102 (185191)
02-14-2005 3:29 PM
Reply to: Message 36 by mike the wiz
02-14-2005 3:18 PM


because humans are obviously living conscious beings - able to design and create, like God.
Really? I don't find that in the least obvious, not least of which because I see so few humans actually designing or creating anything. I appear to be conscious to myself; can you prove that anyone actually is conscious?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by mike the wiz, posted 02-14-2005 3:18 PM mike the wiz has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 55 of 102 (185746)
02-16-2005 2:12 AM
Reply to: Message 54 by riVeRraT
02-15-2005 11:31 PM


Re: Question
But the gap in intelligence between humans and other species, makes me wonder about evolution. Why are we the only ones so advanced?
Clearly, being intelligent isn't all that great an adaptation. The most successful species on Eath, after all, do just fine without it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by riVeRraT, posted 02-15-2005 11:31 PM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by riVeRraT, posted 02-16-2005 6:11 AM crashfrog has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 64 of 102 (185849)
02-16-2005 11:44 AM
Reply to: Message 56 by riVeRraT
02-16-2005 6:11 AM


Re: Question
I bet you could be that species right now, don't you.
Allow me to draw your attention to the forum guidelines, smartass:
quote:
3) Respect for others is the rule here. Argue the position, not the person. The Britannica says, "Usually, in a well-conducted debate, speakers are either emotionally uncommitted or can preserve sufficient detachment to maintain a coolly academic approach."
I answered your question, and your only response is to tell me I'm stupid?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by riVeRraT, posted 02-16-2005 6:11 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 84 by riVeRraT, posted 02-17-2005 5:12 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024