Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Education
mark24
Member (Idle past 5225 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 292 of 304 (273642)
12-28-2005 6:55 PM
Reply to: Message 290 by Carico
12-28-2005 6:39 PM


Re: N.A.S. Evo-Knowledge vs. My Cat's
Carico,
So are you interested in teaching truth of fiction?
The truth. Which rules out the scientifically contradicted creationism.
If you're interested in teaching the truth, then there is no reason to try to keep the biblical account of creation out of the classrooms, unless, of course, you're afraid of hearing and teaching all sides of an issue.
And does your scholarly leniency go so far as teaching other religions creation accounts as well as chistianities?
It really goes back to teaching the truth, or at least the best we can know. The biblical creation account & timeline is scientifically contradicted. Even were that not true, the biblical account has no supporting evidence & therefore no real veracity. This is why it is a religion & they have to put so much stock in pure faith.
Moreover, you have a post (or two) to catch up with here. I particularly took offense with being called liar. Please show me where I lied or retract the accusation. You are supposed to be a christian. Act like one.
Mark

There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't

This message is a reply to:
 Message 290 by Carico, posted 12-28-2005 6:39 PM Carico has not replied

mark24
Member (Idle past 5225 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 298 of 304 (278176)
01-11-2006 1:53 PM
Reply to: Message 296 by Philip
01-11-2006 11:16 AM


Re: N.A.S. Evo-Knowledge vs. My Cat's
Philip,
A disclaimer against false science in classrooms is humanistic and legalistic (i.e., to protect against freaky science)
But not when directed against perfectly valid science because it offends evidence free religion.
Mark

There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't

This message is a reply to:
 Message 296 by Philip, posted 01-11-2006 11:16 AM Philip has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 300 by Philip, posted 01-11-2006 6:48 PM mark24 has replied

mark24
Member (Idle past 5225 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 301 of 304 (278283)
01-11-2006 6:50 PM
Reply to: Message 300 by Philip
01-11-2006 6:48 PM


Re: N.A.S. Evo-Knowledge vs. My Cat's
Philip,
Because the current mega-ToE is not perfectly valid and is, moreover, seriously flawed and fluked; it must be disclaimed as flawed and such.
Which part of the argument is seriously flawed & fluked? This means show what part of the theory is contradicted by evidence, or is logically fallacious.
Mark
This message has been edited by mark24, 01-11-2006 06:52 PM

There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't

This message is a reply to:
 Message 300 by Philip, posted 01-11-2006 6:48 PM Philip has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024