Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,920 Year: 4,177/9,624 Month: 1,048/974 Week: 7/368 Day: 7/11 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Education
Wounded King
Member
Posts: 4149
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 04-09-2003


Message 97 of 304 (268049)
12-12-2005 4:17 AM
Reply to: Message 94 by randman
12-12-2005 2:13 AM


Re: the attitude of evos
If you want to discuss embryology why not post to Bernd's new 'Branchial arches or biomechanical flexion folds?', where he directly addresses one of the claims you have recently been making, yet again.
TTFN,
WK

This message is a reply to:
 Message 94 by randman, posted 12-12-2005 2:13 AM randman has not replied

Wounded King
Member
Posts: 4149
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 04-09-2003


Message 254 of 304 (271024)
12-20-2005 7:23 AM


A cross discipline approach to teaching evolution.
There is a recent essay in PLOS Biology which discusses an attempt to produce a broad multidisciplenary course to introduce students from a broad range of subjects with the fundamentals of evolutionary theory (Wilson, 2005).
This seems like a worthwhile objective to me, although I'm sure there are those who will merely see it as a more open form of the 'indoctrination' they have claimed goes on anyway.
As I say this seems like a worthwhile project to me but I was wondering what opinions, if any, others might have on it.
Wilson DS.
Evolution for Everyone: How to Increase Acceptance of, Interest in, and Knowledge about Evolution.
PLoS Biol. 2005 Dec;3(12):e364. Epub 2005 Dec 13.
Evolution is famously controversial, despite being as well established as any scientific theory. Most people are familiar with the dismal statistics, showing how a large fraction of Americans at all educational levels do not accept the theory of evolution [1], how efforts to teach evolution often fail to have an impact [2], and how constant vigilance is required to keep evolution in the public school curriculum [3]. Even worse, most people who do accept the theory of evolution don't relate it to matters of importance in their own lives. There appear to be two walls of resistance, one denying the theory altogether and the other denying its relevance to human affairs.
This essay reports a success story, showing how both walls of resistance can be surmounted by a single college course, and even more, by a university-wide program. It is based on a campus-wide evolutionary studies program called EvoS (http://bingweb.binghamton.edu/~evos/), initiated at Binghamton University in 2002, which currently includes over 50 faculty members representing 15 departments. Enthusiasm at all levels, from freshmen students to senior administrators, makes EvoS a potential model for evolution education that can be duplicated; the basic ingredients are present at most other institutions, from small colleges to major universities.
In this essay, I will briefly describe the basic ingredients at both the single-course and program levels. First, however, it is important to document the claim that evolution can be made acceptable, interesting, and powerfully relevant to just about anyone in the space of a single semester.
TTFN,
WK

Wounded King
Member
Posts: 4149
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 04-09-2003


Message 259 of 304 (271307)
12-21-2005 10:04 AM
Reply to: Message 257 by RobertFitz
12-21-2005 9:02 AM


Re: Insane?
This piece from Reuters/MSNBC suggests that Schoenborn found it neccessary to clarify what he meant in his Times piece, presumably the original was vague (and unimportant?).
Without a doubt, Darwin pulled off quite a feat with his main work and it remains one of the very great works of intellectual history,” Schoenborn declared in a lecture in St. Stephen’s Cathedral in Vienna on Sunday. “I see no problem combining belief in the Creator with the theory of evolution, under one condition ” that the limits of a scientific theory are respected.”
Science studies what is observable, and scientists overstep the boundaries of their discipline when they conclude evolution proves there was no creator, said the cardinal, 60, a top Church doctrinal expert and close associate of Pope Benedict XVI.
“It is fully reasonable to assume some sense or design even if the scientific method demands restrictions that shut out this question,"
TTFN,
WK

This message is a reply to:
 Message 257 by RobertFitz, posted 12-21-2005 9:02 AM RobertFitz has not replied

Wounded King
Member
Posts: 4149
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 04-09-2003


Message 261 of 304 (271340)
12-21-2005 10:55 AM
Reply to: Message 260 by Philip
12-21-2005 10:51 AM


Re: Insane Theistic-Evos?
(Note, please go easy on me, I’m just suggesting that science-education might seem more credible if it tolerated a creation-event or something).
I think you are confusing credible with palatable.
TTFN,
WK

This message is a reply to:
 Message 260 by Philip, posted 12-21-2005 10:51 AM Philip has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 262 by Philip, posted 12-21-2005 10:58 AM Wounded King has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024