Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,923 Year: 4,180/9,624 Month: 1,051/974 Week: 10/368 Day: 10/11 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Big Bang Critics
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5939 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 62 of 130 (246272)
09-25-2005 9:58 AM
Reply to: Message 59 by b b
09-25-2005 6:41 AM


Re: Thank and goodnight
bytchbeater
But i believe that if the big bang happened it happened because God willed or spoke it into existence. I don't think God is a magician. I believe everything that he does can be explained
Good to hear.Perhaps you would care to exercise the grey matter and postulate the mechanism by which willpower or voice can create a universe? What does it mean to have willpower? Indeed,what is willpower sir? I will bet you have not thought this through very well.

But I realize now that these people were not in science; they didn’t understand it. They didn’t understand technology; they didn’t understand their time.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by b b, posted 09-25-2005 6:41 AM b b has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 63 by b b, posted 09-25-2005 3:51 PM sidelined has replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5939 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 70 of 130 (246401)
09-25-2005 10:01 PM
Reply to: Message 63 by b b
09-25-2005 3:51 PM


Re: Thank and goodnight
b.b.
I believe the 90 or so percent of our brain we don't understand is the key to the will power.
Really! And what 90% do you not use sir? You have fallen for the old nugget of wisdom that is not backed by evidence in the least. A phrase repeated often enough gets to be accepted as true even in the face of evidence to the contrary.You say you are a deep thinker sir,pray tell which 90% do you believe you could damage without any affect upon your normal functioning?

But I realize now that these people were not in science; they didn’t understand it. They didn’t understand technology; they didn’t understand their time.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 63 by b b, posted 09-25-2005 3:51 PM b b has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 71 by b b, posted 09-26-2005 1:41 AM sidelined has not replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5939 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 73 of 130 (246512)
09-26-2005 10:11 AM
Reply to: Message 72 by AdminNosy
09-26-2005 2:15 AM


Re: such a collection of errors
AdminNosy
Sorry big guy I am too easilty drawn to this. I will start a new topic specific to this B.B. fellows arguements.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by AdminNosy, posted 09-26-2005 2:15 AM AdminNosy has not replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5939 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 77 of 130 (333948)
07-21-2006 11:18 AM
Reply to: Message 74 by 2ice_baked_taters
07-21-2006 2:39 AM


2ice_baked_taters
Energy does not end it just changes form. Apply that basic idea to the universe.
What do you mean that it changes form 2i_b_t?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 74 by 2ice_baked_taters, posted 07-21-2006 2:39 AM 2ice_baked_taters has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 79 by 2ice_baked_taters, posted 07-21-2006 6:23 PM sidelined has replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5939 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 84 of 130 (334227)
07-22-2006 8:39 AM
Reply to: Message 79 by 2ice_baked_taters
07-21-2006 6:23 PM


2ice_baked_taters
Energy to matter/matter to energy
or more accurately matter being energy in a specific state
I think you are confusing matter with mass {as in E=MC^2}. Mass and energy is equivalent in mass-energy conservation. Matter is a different matter.
For instance, if you heat an object its mass increases but the matter remains the same.If you have two objects collide in an inelastic impact the mass sums to greater than the individual bodies had yet the amount of matter remains the same.
Edited by sidelined, : No reason given.
Edited by sidelined, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 79 by 2ice_baked_taters, posted 07-21-2006 6:23 PM 2ice_baked_taters has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 85 by Philip, posted 07-24-2006 1:05 PM sidelined has not replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5939 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 94 of 130 (335129)
07-25-2006 9:59 AM
Reply to: Message 89 by cavediver
07-24-2006 6:18 PM


Re: Confusing Matter with Mass {as in E=MC^2}
cavediver
Mass is a property of matter AND energy.
So if mass is a property of energy how is it that mass and energy are equivalent in E=MC^2?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 89 by cavediver, posted 07-24-2006 6:18 PM cavediver has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 97 by cavediver, posted 07-25-2006 1:27 PM sidelined has replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5939 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 99 of 130 (336809)
07-31-2006 2:28 AM
Reply to: Message 97 by cavediver
07-25-2006 1:27 PM


Re: Confusing Matter with Mass {as in E=MC^2}
cavediver
Mass is a measure of the energy content of a volume of space in the context of gravitation.
How does mass relate to inertia in the context of this definition?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 97 by cavediver, posted 07-25-2006 1:27 PM cavediver has not replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5939 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 116 of 130 (341947)
08-21-2006 1:07 PM
Reply to: Message 114 by 2ice_baked_taters
08-21-2006 12:24 PM


2ice_baked_taters
I am not for or against a big bang hypothesis. I am against those who claim evidence suppports a hypothesis. We know very little and have far more questions than answers. "evidence" has a funny way of being interpreted by individuals.
So you have found a specific error with aspects of the big bang theory? Which points of evidence do you dispute?
The cosmic microwave background? WMAP Cosmology 101: Cosmic Microwave Background
The hydrogen_helium abundance? http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/astro/hydhel.html
The expansion of the universe? Expansion of the universe - Wikipedia
Where exactly in the physics of the model of the big bang theory do you find fault in the reasoning? How would your model explain it?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 114 by 2ice_baked_taters, posted 08-21-2006 12:24 PM 2ice_baked_taters has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 119 by 2ice_baked_taters, posted 08-22-2006 6:04 AM sidelined has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024