Big Bang - Big Dud

I was sent here because I am a beginner and I casually posted an irrelevant reply in another thread.but my question is, Explosions are destructive, not constructive. The Big Bang in the essence of its words is an explosion. Bang in the dictionary is "a sudden loud noise, as of an explosion." or "a sudden burst of action." in the informal sense. (which I would take to be the non-true meaning of the word)Why is this fact so easily cast aside?

The bomb exploded, killing thousands.
The lung exploded, killing a person.
The person with an explosive personality, angry outbursts.The reason I think all explosions are destructive is because they are. The explosions such as an "explosive income" or "explosive knowledge" are metaphorical. Using the secondary definition of the word explosive doesn't support much.

I'd rather not refer to myself as what I'm physically made of. I have a soul and I would rather be a masterpiece of Creation than an evolutionary process.This message has been edited by daaaaaBEAR, 01-25-2005 23:32 AM

You say our "packaging" is the result of explosions, but what about the soul. The soul is intangible and could not be the result of explosions unless humans have no souls which would put us at the same level as any life-form. What is the origin of the soul? Surely there was not a culmination of souls in what expanded into our universe, animals don't have a spiritual nature like humans and it seems impossible that a soul would evolve and more improbable that humans would spontaneously gain a soul through the evolutionary process.Unless we're all just empty human beings.

pretty sure that's an oxymoron if explosions destroy.

So evolution's true? do you really believe that?

How do I know that's true? If evolution is not the answer to the origin of the first living things and the formation of the universe then where do you go? Is that just a blank page waiting for an answer?aside from this I would like to know how the "unfolding" of the universe caused the Earth's placement to be so exact that if it was farther or closer away from the sun, we would freeze or burn up respectively.This message has been edited by daaaaaBEAR, 01-26-2005 17:15 AM

Chance? Chance is a likelihood that something will happen as you said. There's a likelihood that that 13.7 billion years nothing "expanded" into everything that is today. There is also a likelihood that this universe was created by God who set the clock.Which brings an interesting view to mind: Who started the clock? When did time began and intialize the explosion of our universe compressed into the confines of an atomic nucleus?There HAS to be a starting point, a stopwatch does not just start but has to have a button pushed. Did God push start the time with the push of button and let the Big Bang take its course? This is illogical since, given his infinite power, he could have created everything with out the the billions of years.

You're claiming that since everything might be a delusion no person can find truth. Does our whole humanity submit to possibile lies? Why are you here? For what purpose have you been placed on this earth for God's sake!! Are we merely life-forms with no eternal purpose just to rot in our grave and be forgotten?I know the Bible can't convince anybody who doesn't want to believe in it but I think this verse might bring light to the frustration of creationists versus evolutionists:
1 Timothy 4:3,4
"3For the time will come when men will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear. 4They will turn their ears away from the truth and turn aside to myths."I don't mean to infringe on any scientific theories but only to convey what we believe to be the truthful, inspired, Word of God and how it affects our view in this debate.

Thanks for agreeing with me but these "evo witnessers" are just trying (trying key word) to maintain a healthy debate. The creation vs. evolution debate is not spiritual, its good science vs. bad science.

Obviously you are otherwise you would believe that he created this universe.

This sounds to me like changing answers to one question: How did everything come to be as it is today? What you just said portrays that you every new piece of data is desperately used to support theories that are falling apart. I have the answers, they're in the Bible but where are yours? I don't have to come up with a purpose for my life, God already has one. I am given free will to love God or reject him, obey him or disobey him, die eternally or live eternally. That probably sounds like a load of crap to those who can only believe in a world you can touch, but the way he has changed my life and countless others is more real than anything on this earth.Crash, you didn't even answer my question. Instead of saying "I" you said just related to me: What is YOUR purpose in life? Give me a straight answer, that's all I want. Why are YOU unique from everyone else? Evolution and the Big Bang cannot answer these questions.

I'm talking about the uniqueness of your personality, the way you talk, your passions, what makes chills go down your back, courage, honor, like actual virtues. How did those come from monkeys?....Sorry, I'm still a beginner. But I would like crash to answer the question as well as anyone else. But I'll try to relate it back to the Big Bang theory being a complete sham...it seems like every question that evolutionists really don't want to answer gets scolded or rejected.This message has been edited by daaaaaBEAR, 01-28-2005 16:46 AM

It's not complex at all, God being the ultimate Creator is the simplest answer if you believe in it. And wouldn't an "already complex universe" make the Big Bang theory less credible and the idea of a Creator more truthful to the facts.

It doesn't bother me but it should bother you and others who follow the same logic. Knowledge about our universe will probably always increase but what about the truth? Do theories just hold as temporary answers till a more reliable one arises? Theories don't prove anything. Portraying these theories as fact is hypocrisy, when you criticize Creationists for their beliefs in a created universe.