Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Big Bang - Big Dud
CreationScientist
Inactive Member


Message 1 of 287 (96079)
03-30-2004 6:04 PM


Argument against the Big Bang
By CreationScientist
The definition for the Big Bang I took out of page 362 of the ?HBJ General Science? 1989 Edition Textbook.
?In the realm of the universe nothing really means nothing. Not only would matter and energy disappear, but also space and time. However, physicists theorize that from this state of nothingness the universe began in a gigantic explosion 16.6 billion years ago.?
Also from the ?Scientific American? May 1984 Edition Page 128.
?The observable universe could have formed from an infinitesimal region? The entire universe evolved from literally nothing.?
As stated above in the beginning there was nothing than it exploded. Does everybody know what the first law of thermodynamics says? Matter cannot be created nor destroyed. Here matter is definitely being formed from nothing. This is just bad science; even the most basic scientist knows that matter could not have arising from nothing exploding.
On page 61 of the 1992 Edition ?Prentice Hall General Science? textbook it states.
?Most scientists believe that 18 to 20 billion years ago, all the matter in the universe was concentrated into a very dense, very hot region that may have been much smaller than a period on this page. For some unknown reason this region exploded. This explosion is called the Big Bang.?
In this at least there is matter to begin with.
On page 69 the book states that ?as the nebula shrank it spun faster and faster.? So this region is spinning. Does everybody know what the law of conservation of angular momentum is? This law states that in a frictionless environment, remember above it said all the matter in the universe was concentrated, if a spinning object brakes up the pieces will spin in the same direction as the original object.
Two planets spin backwards, one spins on its side, and Jupiter has several moons that orbit the planet backwards and spin backwards. Doesn?t this seem just a little strange to you? You may say that maybe something struck the planets to make them spin backwards. Do you know what it would take to reverse the spin of a planet? I think it would leave a dent.
Evolution is every bit as much as a religion as creation is. When you get right down to it, you must believe something without knowing why it happened. ?For some unknown reason this region exploded.?
This message has been edited by Admin, 01-28-2006 11:48 AM

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by crashfrog, posted 03-30-2004 6:16 PM CreationScientist has not replied
 Message 3 by JonF, posted 03-30-2004 6:28 PM CreationScientist has not replied
 Message 4 by Loudmouth, posted 03-30-2004 6:37 PM CreationScientist has not replied
 Message 5 by mark24, posted 03-30-2004 6:45 PM CreationScientist has not replied
 Message 6 by simple, posted 03-30-2004 7:21 PM CreationScientist has not replied
 Message 14 by Eta_Carinae, posted 03-31-2004 12:21 AM CreationScientist has not replied
 Message 47 by Eggmann, posted 04-02-2004 3:36 PM CreationScientist has not replied
 Message 49 by SRO2, posted 04-04-2004 9:14 PM CreationScientist has not replied
 Message 51 by SoulFire, posted 04-05-2004 8:42 PM CreationScientist has not replied
 Message 88 by jar, posted 04-22-2004 2:19 PM CreationScientist has not replied
 Message 89 by NosyNed, posted 04-22-2004 2:39 PM CreationScientist has not replied
 Message 93 by AdminSylas, posted 05-13-2004 7:40 PM CreationScientist has not replied
 Message 107 by DC85, posted 05-16-2004 1:23 AM CreationScientist has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024