|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,904 Year: 4,161/9,624 Month: 1,032/974 Week: 359/286 Day: 2/13 Hour: 1/1 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: The Power of the New Intelligent Design... | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sensei Member Posts: 480 Joined: |
It was an example of data. Now you add the requirement of data to have to be scientific, in this simple context of an example even. This is what you evolutionists do. You been shown that your arguments fail, so you change the rules as you fit.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sensei Member Posts: 480 Joined: |
And you think mankind have always been able to observe and measure movents of other planets?
In early days, when we only had observations of Sun moving through sky during the day, geocentric was more parimonious. Parsimony rule is not perfect, so don't hold on to it like it's a must follow rule.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sensei Member Posts: 480 Joined: |
If you insist on this game of yours of observing nested hierarchies, you should first define what you call a hierarchy and what not.
How else are we going to determine whether or not some observation is to be considered as a hierarchy?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sensei Member Posts: 480 Joined: |
I asked to define hierarchy. Next step would be to define nesting.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sensei Member Posts: 480 Joined: |
Same reply to you. Define hierarchy.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sensei Member Posts: 480 Joined: |
And how do you define rank in context of evolution?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sensei Member Posts: 480 Joined: |
This is not a definition.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sensei Member Posts: 480 Joined: |
You keep talking about nested hierarchy. Then define it, before discussing. Otherwise, your claim of observing a nested hierarchy is useless.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sensei Member Posts: 480 Joined: |
How do you define troll?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sensei Member Posts: 480 Joined: |
How is evolutionist more made up than creationist, hypocrite!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sensei Member Posts: 480 Joined: |
You still have not defined hierarchy.
And what you wrote or quoted, is also not a definition even.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sensei Member Posts: 480 Joined: |
You are so easily content with vague definitions.
How do you measure rank in biology? Taq described nested hierarchy without defining it, and without defining hierarchy in particular even. If you can't define it, then just say so.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sensei Member Posts: 480 Joined: |
He uses the term. He wants evolutionist defined. Then he should define creationist as well. Whatever it is.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sensei Member Posts: 480 Joined: |
If some one claims that nested hierarchy is observed and insists that we discuss this further, then yes, hierarchy needs to be defined. You lots failed to do so. No surprise there.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sensei Member Posts: 480 Joined: |
A rant and a few examples is not a definition. What is a hierarchy? What are the ranks? How do we determine of two arbitrary species how they are ranked, relative to each other or relative to a general ranking scale?
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024