Discrimination ok, if based on religion? what else then?

Yeah... wouldn't want to go taking a stand on something as morally ambiguous as genocide.

---

"I know some of you are going to say 'I did look it up, and that's not true.' That's 'cause you looked it up in a book. Next time, look it up in your gut."
-Stephen Colbert

Yes, the politics of killing 11 million people. That's the kind of thing on which religion should just stay nice and neutral. It must have been easy to assume that 11 million people had just sorta taken an extended nap. Best not to say anything before all the facts are in.Either way, I'm sure the Catholic Church rushed right out to correct their mistake, and acknowledge what a bad thing that neutrality was immediately after the horrible truth had come to light. To do otherwise would just be sick.

---

"I know some of you are going to say 'I did look it up, and that's not true.' That's 'cause you looked it up in a book. Next time, look it up in your gut."
-Stephen Colbert

I'm sure there's a proper context in which the murder of 11 million people suddenly becomes debatable, morally. Who am I to judge? Schraf's post above makes for interesting reading. It doesn't take a tremendous amount of involvement in politics to say the words, "genocide is wrong."

---

"I know some of you are going to say 'I did look it up, and that's not true.' That's 'cause you looked it up in a book. Next time, look it up in your gut."
-Stephen Colbert

Highlight the URL. Hold "ctrl" and press "C".When writing your post, hold "ctrl" and press "V".

---

"I know some of you are going to say 'I did look it up, and that's not true.' That's 'cause you looked it up in a book. Next time, look it up in your gut."
-Stephen Colbert

There are handy-dandy instructions in my previous post that will help you support your points.Edit: Ut... I see you've added a link. It suggests that the Pope in fact saved hundreds of thousands of Jews from the holocaust.How could the Pope have been saving Jews from the holocaust, and simultaneously been unaware that the holocaust was happening? That seems kind of impossible. In this case, I heard that genocide is wrong. I understand that this might me seem downright gullible, but I'll go ahead and stick with it.Edited by Dan Carroll, : No reason given.

---

"I know some of you are going to say 'I did look it up, and that's not true.' That's 'cause you looked it up in a book. Next time, look it up in your gut."
-Stephen Colbert

From your link: That's not exactly a ringing endorsement of your already-morally-questionable neutrality argument.

---

"I know some of you are going to say 'I did look it up, and that's not true.' That's 'cause you looked it up in a book. Next time, look it up in your gut."
-Stephen Colbert

I'm still confused as to how the church managed to be fooled into thinking the holocaust wasn't going on, but still send the Pope on a one-man rescue mission, a la Rambo, to single-handedly save hundreds of thousands of Jews from the holocaust.

---

"I know some of you are going to say 'I did look it up, and that's not true.' That's 'cause you looked it up in a book. Next time, look it up in your gut."
-Stephen Colbert

I see. Those 700,000 people may or may not have actually been saved by the church, in reality. But it's fun to interpret history in such a way that they were.

---

"I know some of you are going to say 'I did look it up, and that's not true.' That's 'cause you looked it up in a book. Next time, look it up in your gut."
-Stephen Colbert