Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why TOE is not accepted
MangyTiger
Member (Idle past 6383 days)
Posts: 989
From: Leicester, UK
Joined: 07-30-2004


Message 149 of 318 (228166)
07-31-2005 5:14 PM
Reply to: Message 148 by CK
07-31-2005 5:04 PM


Re: More waffle - let's get specific
2) give 3 examples of where the application of "creation science" has provided an innovation or some other concrete form of scientific progress.
Call me cynical but you probably should have specified "Newton was a Creationist when he wrote Principia doesn't count".

Oops! Wrong Planet

This message is a reply to:
 Message 148 by CK, posted 07-31-2005 5:04 PM CK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 150 by CK, posted 07-31-2005 5:19 PM MangyTiger has replied

MangyTiger
Member (Idle past 6383 days)
Posts: 989
From: Leicester, UK
Joined: 07-30-2004


Message 152 of 318 (228175)
07-31-2005 5:34 PM
Reply to: Message 150 by CK
07-31-2005 5:19 PM


Re: More waffle - let's get specific
Off the top of my head before I get too engrossed in Scream 3 (always thought Courtney Cox was seriously cute ):
2) give 3 examples of where the application of "creation science" has provided an innovation or some other concrete form of scientific progress (note I'm not asking here for examples of scientists who believed in Biblical Creation, rather for how the application of that belief led to a scientific breakthrough).
P.S. Just read your edit - limiting it to the '40s onwards works too

Oops! Wrong Planet

This message is a reply to:
 Message 150 by CK, posted 07-31-2005 5:19 PM CK has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024