Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,906 Year: 4,163/9,624 Month: 1,034/974 Week: 361/286 Day: 4/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Ken Ham is ... EXPELLED
Wounded King
Member
Posts: 4149
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 04-09-2003


Message 53 of 76 (609977)
03-25-2011 7:08 AM
Reply to: Message 52 by Percy
03-25-2011 6:28 AM


Re: Homeschooling conventions
Most creationist rejections of evolution that we see here are based upon profound misunderstandings of evolution
The thing that always seems weird to me is that this is the case even with those who have PhDs in relevant areas. The crazy stuff Jonathan Wells, such as the polar ejection model of cancer and claiming that genetics don't affect morphology, comes up with always surprises me.
TTFN,
WK
Edited by Wounded King, : No reason given.
Edited by Wounded King, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by Percy, posted 03-25-2011 6:28 AM Percy has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by jar, posted 03-25-2011 9:50 AM Wounded King has not replied

  
Wounded King
Member
Posts: 4149
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 04-09-2003


Message 63 of 76 (610001)
03-25-2011 11:49 AM
Reply to: Message 60 by Taq
03-25-2011 11:25 AM


Re: beliefs and profession
We already know what they will say, that what is being measured is really a reflection of a common originating designer rather than evolutionary relatedness. We know this because they say it a hell of a lot of the time to try and dismiss arguments based on homology at all sorts of levels.
TTFN,
WK

This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by Taq, posted 03-25-2011 11:25 AM Taq has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024