DHA writes:
Which leads to the second claim of the intelligent design argument:
the physical marks of design are visible in aspects of biology. This is uncontroversial, too.
Michael Behe NYT article.
So does this mean that Behe, or other ID advocates, won't need mandatory labeling on food products to indicate the presence of genetically modified ingredients?
Seriously, how would Behe, or anyone else, given two tomatoes be able to determine which one was engineered in a lab by man, and which was engineered by God?
This message has been edited by custard, 02-26-2005 16:38 AM