Yes, I agree completely. Skeptics have an interest in linking the two ideas primarily because they want the theory of evolution to be dependent on abiogenesis, and one of their arguments is that abiogenesis would be at the origin and root of the entire tree of life. They sometimes claim that abiogenesis is the "foundation" of the theory of evolution. The opposite reaction--completely separating abiogenesis from the theory of evolution--would be another misleading extreme. There is no doubt that abiogenesis has a strong relation to the theory of evolution--it really is the best explanation for the beginning of the root of the tree--but it would not be the essential foundation of the ToE.
The theory of evolution is not dependent on abiogenesis! NOT! NEVER HAS BEEN! ISN'T! NO HOW!
The theory of evolution works equally well if abiogenesis occurred, some deity (Loki maybe) created life, life was started from outer space, or life was transferred back from the future. In any of these cases the theory of evolution works the same.
Given that there is no evidence whatsoever for deities, that explanation might be discounted, but at present we don't have any firm evidence for or against the other alternatives.
But that doesn't matter! Evolution works just fine in any case.
Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.
™ Version 4.2
