ApostateAbe writes:
Dennett is kinda the authority on the interplay between the theory of evolution and atheism (wrote the book on it), though he is not a historian, and being a historian is what would be required to do "very careful research." I don't know for sure if there was ever a historical study to answer the question on whether or not Darwin "broke the dam" for atheism, though historians really don't do it so differently from how the rest of us do it, except of course they would be a lot more thorough--examining all the evidence available, putting all explanations on the table, and choosing the explanation that fits best.
I have made some specific historical claims, and you can just ask me which of them you would like me to prove if you like.
I'd like you to support the historical claim that Darwin was responsible for a substantial increase in atheism.
quote:
Yeah, I don't go through the trouble of proving every claim and assumption.
But it would be nice if you supported your central claim.
quote:
If you think this is an issue that requires only a thorough historical study by qualified researchers, then never you mind. Such an opinion does not matter so much to me.
I didn't suggest that you needed a degree in history to do the research, just that you actually offer some historical evidence. If Dennett did the research, great, present that. So far, based on what you've given us, I have no idea at all whether Darwin had a great deal to do with increasing atheism or nothing at all.