Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,907 Year: 4,164/9,624 Month: 1,035/974 Week: 362/286 Day: 5/13 Hour: 0/2


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Is It Science? ⇒

Does ID follow the scientific method?

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Does ID follow the scientific method?
Panda
Member (Idle past 3742 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010

Normal Thread Display
Message 17 of 121 (591809)
11-16-2010 9:31 AM 		Reply to: Message 15 by Dawn Bertot
11-15-2010 11:36 PM

Re: Confusion Still Exists
​
Edited by Panda, : See next post.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-15-2010 11:36 PM Dawn Bertot has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by Admin, posted 11-16-2010 9:52 AM Panda has seen this message but not replied
Panda
Member (Idle past 3742 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010

Normal Thread Display
Message 20 of 121 (591826)
11-16-2010 10:21 AM 		Reply to: Message 1 by Dawn Bertot
11-05-2010 1:09 AM

DB writes:
​
These basics are of course:
​
Observation, evaluation, experimentation (tests), corroboration, determination, predictions (if you will) and of course conclusions
The start seems like a good place to start:
Please describe an example of an observation made by IDM.
​
Also, I do not currently understand how 'determination' is linked to the scientific method.
Please ellaborate on what you mean by 'determination'.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-05-2010 1:09 AM Dawn Bertot has not replied
Panda
Member (Idle past 3742 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010

Normal Thread Display
Message 44 of 121 (592065)
11-18-2010 9:21 AM 		Reply to: Message 41 by Dawn Bertot
11-18-2010 2:20 AM

Re: Finally the Scientific Method of Intelligent Design
DB writes:
​
His evaluations had to involve presuppositions (SMs)and then conclusions, correct?
'Presuppositions' is not a synonym for 'Scientific Methods', so to answer your question: no - not correct.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-18-2010 2:20 AM Dawn Bertot has not replied
Panda
Member (Idle past 3742 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010

Normal Thread Display
Message 50 of 121 (592122)
11-18-2010 9:56 PM

​
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Off-topic banner.
​
Edited by Panda, : Hidden as deemed to be off-topic
Panda
Member (Idle past 3742 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010

Normal Thread Display
Message 69 of 121 (592208)
11-19-2010 6:25 AM 		Reply to: Message 53 by Dawn Bertot
11-19-2010 1:57 AM

Re: Design vs. non-design
Dawn Bertot writes:
​
It has been alleged in the following posts that I have no stated my position, this is wrong.
You are prescient?
Well, maybe you meant to say 'previous posts'.
​
Dawn Bertot writes:
​
I will state it again and see if perhaps you will attempt to answer it
How are we meant to answer a statement?
Well, maybe you meant to say 'address it'.
​
Ok - let's see you state your position.
Dawn Bertot writes:
​
What besides the categories of Observation, experimentation, evaluation, and prediction does the SM use that we do not?
​
Secondly if we use the same methods why is ours considered NOT science
Hmmm...2 questions.
​
Well, maybe you meant to say...nope, I can't guess.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-19-2010 1:57 AM Dawn Bertot has not replied
Panda
Member (Idle past 3742 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010

Normal Thread Display
Message 71 of 121 (592214)
11-19-2010 6:43 AM 		Reply to: Message 57 by Dawn Bertot
11-19-2010 2:16 AM

Re: Hypotheses
Dawn Bertot writes:
​
Your goal is to simply demonstrate what you use that we do not and then show why ours is not science, or a scientific approach
Again, you start a thread and then expect everyone to run around doing your homework for you.
​
YOU made the first post.
YOU claim that IDM is as valid as SM.
It is YOU that must provide evidence for your assertion.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-19-2010 2:16 AM Dawn Bertot has not replied
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024