Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 2/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Define literal vs non-literal.
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4219 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 25 of 271 (547056)
02-16-2010 12:27 AM
Reply to: Message 24 by Peg
02-16-2010 12:03 AM


e, cosmic rays are never steady, they could have been stronger or weaker in the past ...
refer to Message 97 in the topic PRATT Party Free for All for an explanation of the calibration of Radio carbon dating.

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by Peg, posted 02-16-2010 12:03 AM Peg has not replied

bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4219 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 241 of 271 (552461)
03-29-2010 9:56 AM
Reply to: Message 233 by Peg
03-26-2010 5:05 AM


Re: Morning and Evening
I would have to disagree with you on the timing of the writing of the books of the NT.
I would also disagree with you on the point of Jesus not being spoken of as an earthly literal person.
the gospels are the account of his life and they certainly present a real person.
You may have every right to believe this but, for the sake of argument, from what evidence do you derive this?

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
 Message 233 by Peg, posted 03-26-2010 5:05 AM Peg has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 243 by kbertsche, posted 03-29-2010 10:36 AM bluescat48 has not replied
 Message 259 by Peg, posted 03-31-2010 5:27 AM bluescat48 has replied

bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4219 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 262 of 271 (552835)
03-31-2010 11:28 AM
Reply to: Message 259 by Peg
03-31-2010 5:27 AM


Re: Morning and Evening
Regarding Jesus as being a real historical figure - Josephus mentions his brothers by name as "James the brother of the one called Christ"
And there are Roman writers such as Suetonius, Pliny, and the Roman historian Tacitus who all confirm the historicity of Jesus. For critics to claim that he was not a real person is just ludicrous.
Showing he was a real person does not imply that what he was alleged to have done was in any proved, Just that he existed.

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
 Message 259 by Peg, posted 03-31-2010 5:27 AM Peg has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 263 by Peg, posted 03-31-2010 7:57 PM bluescat48 has replied

bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4219 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 265 of 271 (552970)
04-01-2010 12:28 AM
Reply to: Message 263 by Peg
03-31-2010 7:57 PM


Re: Morning and Evening
true, so why do many continue with the silly notion that he was not a real person???
I hope that is a rhetorical question, since I can't say what John Doe or Jack Sprat thinks.

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
 Message 263 by Peg, posted 03-31-2010 7:57 PM Peg has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024