Fossil Sorting in the Great Flood Part 2

arkathon, And yet the fossil record so clearly matches evolutionary predictions.http://EvC Forum: The Religious Nature of Evolution, or Lack Thereof -->EvC Forum: The Religious Nature of Evolution, or Lack ThereofMarkThis message has been edited by mark24, 06-26-2004 12:48 PM

Robert,History uses the same hypothetico-inductive method science does. Hypotheses are inferred, there are potential falsifications & predictions.Mark

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't

Brad,For crying out loud, in your single paragraph there's three full stops/periods, & no commas whatsoever. Paragraphs are your friend. The first sentence has in excess of 120 words without a breathing space. You trying to kill us?You really expect people to read this? I assume that because you took the time to write this, you expect us to take the time to read it? Perhaps if you took the time to add some form of rudimentary punctuation?It's not just the lack of punctuation, either. Anyone?I KNOW you have something interesting to say, but you may as well write in Hebrew for the sense it makes.Mark

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't

Robert, Tell me, are electrons, protons & neutrons scientifically valid? I only ask because no one has seen them, either.Come to think of it, you have rendered all of chemistry, & most of physics as being unscientific.I put it to you that "interpretation" is a part of science. Any given interpretation is testable & falsifiable. Like most science, it's the sheer amount of evidence in favour of any given interpretation that buoys it up. It matters not a jot as to whether the hypothesis is historical, or not.Mark

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't

Robert,Paragraphs are our friend.MarkThis message has been edited by mark24, 08-17-2004 07:55 PM