Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
0 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Kalam Cosmological argument
Wounded King
Member
Posts: 4149
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 04-09-2003


Message 39 of 178 (332804)
07-18-2006 8:51 AM
Reply to: Message 38 by Hyroglyphx
07-18-2006 8:47 AM


Re: Incomplete
Can you tell us what the cause would be for either of those effects?
TTFN,
WK

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by Hyroglyphx, posted 07-18-2006 8:47 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 40 by cavediver, posted 07-18-2006 8:58 AM Wounded King has replied

  
Wounded King
Member
Posts: 4149
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 04-09-2003


Message 43 of 178 (332816)
07-18-2006 9:17 AM
Reply to: Message 40 by cavediver
07-18-2006 8:58 AM


Re: Incomplete
I didn't say that they weren't caused, I asked if he could tell us what the cause was. Simply because one is prepared to accept that the universe must have some 'first' cause does not neccessitate being able to identify such a cause any more than in the cases of radiaoactive decay or the generation of virtual particles.
I wasn't trying to reiterate Ramoss's point, I was trying to see why 'but we don't know what it is' is an acceptable ascription of cause for some things but not for others.
TTFN,
WK

This message is a reply to:
 Message 40 by cavediver, posted 07-18-2006 8:58 AM cavediver has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 45 by cavediver, posted 07-18-2006 9:31 AM Wounded King has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024