Phat writes:
The point is the behavior.
Then why did you ask me about marriage?
Phat writes:
Perhaps the question should be framed as this: Should society have a right to suggest appropriate behavior?
Society will inevitably do exactly that. The question is how individual rights and societal consensus are balanced.
Phat writes:
Would I be bigoted if I informed an amorous car lover that their behavior was harmful?
Harmful to whom?
If it were demonstrably harmful and you had the facts on your side it wouldn't be bigoted to present the facts. But what the person in question does with those facts is largely up to them. If you start selecting facts to push an agenda then it may well qualify as bigotry on your part.
Phat writes:
What do we tell our children about human behavior and why do we tell them what we tell/teach them?
Well the actualities of human behaviour might be worth considering - No?
Phat writes:
This goes so far as to include heterosexual behavior as well.
Heterosexuals can get up some pretty unbiblical shit dude. If you gonna preach "conformity" you gonna have your work cut out with the heteros before you even need to consider anyone else.
Blessed are those who do not urinate in each others nostrils....etc.