Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,912 Year: 4,169/9,624 Month: 1,040/974 Week: 367/286 Day: 10/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Immigration Bill is Un-American
anglagard
Member (Idle past 866 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 19 of 115 (405783)
06-14-2007 9:21 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by ThingsChange
06-14-2007 9:14 PM


Re: Rich get richer with illegal immigrants
ThingsChange writes:
Poverty is hard to eradicate, and it's foolish to think that these illegal immigrants will raise many engineers and doctors. History does not bear this out.
What history? Did the Italians and Irish raise engineers and doctors? How about the Japanese or Chinese?
The only thing foolish is to presume Hispanics are somehow inferior to other ethnic groups.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by ThingsChange, posted 06-14-2007 9:14 PM ThingsChange has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by ThingsChange, posted 06-14-2007 9:54 PM anglagard has replied

  
anglagard
Member (Idle past 866 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 22 of 115 (405800)
06-14-2007 10:10 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by ThingsChange
06-14-2007 9:54 PM


Re: Rich get richer with illegal immigrants
ThingsChange writes:
Poverty is hard to eradicate, and it's foolish to think that these illegal immigrants will raise many engineers and doctors. History does not bear this out.
You are taking my statement way out of context and bringing race into the issue and ignoring the premise that it's a huge number in poverty.
You said that history shows that immigrants don't create many engineers or doctors. I say they produce around as many as anyone else, so I call bullshit.
BTW, unless you are a full-blooded Native American, you or your ancestors are immigrants.
Edited by anglagard, : include original quote

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by ThingsChange, posted 06-14-2007 9:54 PM ThingsChange has not replied

  
anglagard
Member (Idle past 866 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 23 of 115 (405803)
06-14-2007 10:52 PM


The Complete Solution to Illegal Immigation
If anyone would like to minimize, or even end, illegal immigration the solution is quite simple. Instead of sitting on your ass stuffing your face with Doritos, go out there and start harvesting vegetables, mow lawns, clean motels, and mix chop suey. Get your kids involved too! If there is no money, there will be no immigrants.
If you are not doing this, and are instead just loafing and collecting the benefits from the fruits of their labors, then stop whining.

  
anglagard
Member (Idle past 866 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 48 of 115 (407862)
06-28-2007 9:56 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by ThingsChange
06-28-2007 9:01 PM


Re: Kill Bill, volume high
While I have some sympathy as to some of the issues you brought up, I am puzzled by your exact stance to some degree on some other areas. Please feel free to elaborate.
ThingsChange writes:
Status quo is better than the proposed bill that would legalize so many people that would qualify for so much benefit it would bleed the middle class and split the culture of this country.
I don't see how the present immigration situation has bankrupted the middle class, if anything coddling the rich with tax breaks, the complete surrender to the goal of the pharmaceutical company profits and mismanaging unnecessary wars is a far greater threat IMO.
I am also puzzled by the idea that the country would be split between two cultures. I have lived all but the three years that I was in the army near the US-Mexican border and we have a culture, commonly referred to as border culture. How would that culture be split and how are things that different in Houston?
Solution:
1. As in medicine, you stop the hemorrhage first. Since the government has no will to really do this, the only real evidence of stoppage would be a fence. So, build a barrier.
Barriers can be punctured, so I'm not sure a Berlin Wall or Iron Curtain is a complete and perfect solution. Too bad some of that Iraq money can't be spent on the economic development of a neighboring nation, I think it would pay more dividends in the long run.
2. National ID card (fingerprint included) for everyone, to help businesses identify illegals.
Not that I have any great objection but you may run into some conservative opposition on that one, 'mark of the beast' and all.
3. Enforce the current laws, especially businesses and expired visas
An often overlooked solution that is usually more responsible than just passing more new laws.
4. If illegal shows up at hospital, treat them and deport them and their family. Set-up a charity to help the folks get back on their feet in their home country.
Not unreasonable on the surface, except that illegals would then not seek treatment for serious communicable diseases for fear of being deported.
5. English as national language
Why bother, if left alone English will eventually become the world language since given enough time, it absorbs all it contacts. Besides, is it that big a deal if someone speaks more than one language, seems to me it would make them more educated and less provincial.
6. Undo the anchor baby law
I don't know. If citizenship is not automatically granted to those born here could that later be used against other parts of the populace to make them stateless and therefore subject to denial of basic human rights or torture under current administration practices?
7. Find ways to embrace the legal immigrants, not reward illegals
I must agree that legal immigrants should be given preference under all circumstances.
Obviously if there were no jobs, there would be no illegals. Either that or the fruit rots in the fields driving up prices since there is not enough labor available to do the job at current cost to the farmer. Would you object to a guest worker program? At least there would be more oversight than the current situation.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by ThingsChange, posted 06-28-2007 9:01 PM ThingsChange has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 50 by ThingsChange, posted 06-28-2007 11:38 PM anglagard has not replied

  
anglagard
Member (Idle past 866 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 90 of 115 (414602)
08-05-2007 6:38 AM
Reply to: Message 89 by Hyroglyphx
08-05-2007 1:53 AM


Re: Reality versus talking points
NJ writes:
First off, there is one wall along the vast expanse of the Mexican-American border and its 90 miles long. It was President Clinton that had it built, btw.
Somehow I doubt that Clinton personally built any 90 mile wall, I think he must have had help from Congress. Now there is supposed to be a 700 mile wall. Perhaps it is time to build bridges instead of walls, seeing how it would be cheaper and all.
What this means is that the money spent for a wall would be better spent improving the economy of the border so that the supply/demand equation is addressed. You seem to want to lose the 'war' on illegal immigration the same way that one wants to lose the 'war' on drugs. It seems irrational that any discussion refuses to address demand.
Secondly, even if there was a wall, it sounds as if you are overlooking why a wall would be built to begin with. You aren't addressing the problem-- which is what an influx would do to the economy.
Exactly what it is doing now, people doing jobs that snooty Americans are too good to do.
Why do you think so many people, including the leaders of every nation, want to secure their borders? Surely they have sensible reasons for doing so.
The only borders anywhere as long as the US border with either Canada or Mexico are those of Russia or China. Are you suggesting we imitate their tactics and make such immigration less desirable by offering bullets instead of bread?
NJ writes:
You're right. There is no need for one because we don't have an immigration problem with Canada. In the unlikely event that Canadians start streaming across the border en masse, I'm pretty sure the heads of state would begin to consider erecting a wall.
Actually if the people here insist on continuing to elect politicians who support torture, disrespect the Constitution, attack science and technology to 'mollify' the religious fanatics and impoverish the future of their own children, it may be Canada that has to erect a wall to prevent a mass exodus from this nation.
Are you advocating a totally free border? If so, don't you think that presents a problem with groups, such as Al Qaeda, posing as Mexican immigrants to infiltrate the country?
Yes it does, that's why there should be a compromise between the need for work and the source of workers. It would be better to create a system by which such need and supply may be matched to the obvious needs of both sides rather than the continuous posturing of politicians.
As I have said before, if this nation wants to stop illegal immigration they have two options, either create a legal route to address the supply/demand problem or all the rednecks can get off their fat ass and pick the fruit, clean the toilets, and roof the houses.
If the government could sort of whimsically create new jobs, now would be the time to do it. I can only think of a handful. The government created the Saturn auto company, and the biggest creation of new jobs was for the Department of Homeland Security. Other than that, what jobs are they going to create in Stinkwater, Florida or Desertville, Arizona?
There are plenty of jobs here, oil and windmills, we have trouble getting students to go to college because the money is so good outside. So I somewhat repeat, stop whining and start working or learning.
Yes, its own. Not the neighborhood kids. The neighborhood kids have their own parents who needs to support them. I'm just wondering why it is that you are refusing to place any blame on the Mexican government when it seems transparent that the main issue lies with them.
Well, I guess all the confederates who so loved this nation they revolted against it could all go on some moral crusade to conquer Mexico as they have chosen to in Iraq.
Or would it be like everyone who tried to conquer China, they got absorbed? As for me rock and roll, I like real Mexican food, Catholics, brunettes, and the Spanish language. Also, no death penalty . Maybe the US would be improved by such an invasion (as it already has in both directions).
he US has laws and allotments for all of these groups. My sister-in-law is deaf. She has a reasonable disability. For that disability, she is compensated SSI for the rest of her natural life. But at the same time, she is chronically lazy. Aside from giving her SSI and help find her work, what should the government do for someone like her who won't help herself?
Have her pick fruit?
You mean pay someone whether or not they actually work? How would that prosper anyone?
What like children or retirees? Do you have some kind of ethical code from Sparta or Nietzsche?
If you treat someone different simply because of their race, of course, that's racism. If you refuse to treat someone in a hospital simply because they are not here legally, yes, that's discrimination. Expecting someone to become a citizen through legal channels does not qualify. They either need to go back home or go through the legal channels.
There are countless immigrants who obtain visas legally. It is not an easy process. Don't you think that it's a slap in the face to have the illegal immigrant more rights than the legal one? What does that say about our justice system?
I agree completely. So I hope in 2008 you vote for solutions instead of the typical 'playing of the race card.'

Read not to contradict and confute, not to believe and take for granted, not to find talk and discourse, but to weigh and consider - Francis Bacon
The more we understand particular things, the more we understand God - Spinoza

This message is a reply to:
 Message 89 by Hyroglyphx, posted 08-05-2007 1:53 AM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 93 by Hyroglyphx, posted 08-05-2007 5:55 PM anglagard has replied

  
anglagard
Member (Idle past 866 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 99 of 115 (414754)
08-06-2007 1:48 AM
Reply to: Message 93 by Hyroglyphx
08-05-2007 5:55 PM


Re: Reality versus talking points
NJ writes:
Its a figure of speech, Ang. Just like saying Bush is hiking up gas prices. Do I mean that to mean that he is single-handedly doing so? Of course not. Do I mean that Bill Clinton single-handedly was out along the Tijuana border building a wall by himself in the middle of desert? Obviously not.
Obviously you missed the point, despite any 'red hot' desire to make the president the emperor on the part of so-called conservatives, there is always Congress. All bills spending money must originate in the House of Representatives, therefore any wall had to be funded by their consent.
Bridges are generally built over water, not dry land, which 98% of the border consists of. Secondly, there has been talk about building a wall, but no resolution has been passed or denied at this point.
Please allow me to elaborate upon what RAZD has pointed out, perhaps too subtly. On the southern border of the US there is a river called the Rio Grande that goes from one end of Texas to the other, from El Paso to Brownsville. This river is approximately half the border between the US and Mexico. On the other side of the US there are things called the 'great lakes' that make up around a third of the northern border of the lower 48 states with Canada. Should we continue this discussion of geography? Personally, I would find it embarrassing, but then again I'm not you.
The "demand" for what? Supply and demand is supposed to be reciprocal, not one sided. What do we gain by letting mass immigrants flow through the border?
In the words of the most illustrious Carlos Mencia "Duh Duh Duh." When the so called 'minutemen' reduced the number of illegal immigrants to Arizona, half the produce rotted in the field. But I guess that some adherents of the idea of Christian charity think it best to feed the insects and let the people with an inappropriate melanin content go hungry.
Ah, right... because produce magically flew off the trees and into the stores before, right?
You said it, I didn't. Evidently this is your position, it is not mine.
The problem is that certain American farmers and corporations are hiring illegal aliens and paying them disparaging wages. They can't get away with that for legal citizens. These bastards pit the immigrant against himself. They threaten them with the fear of deportation if they complain about their wage.
In essence, they're slaves. American authorities should be doing more to put a stop to it. With this much, I'm sure we are in agreement.
Yes, my suggestion is to create a method by which illegal immigrants can be legalized, so that the work gets done and no one is taken advantage of. Are you familiar with the works and words of Cesar Chavez? If not, you should be. He is a lot closer to the Christian ideal as preached by Jesus as opposed to the hate speech of Buchanan, Hannity or O'Reilly.
So, its not as if America has a shortage of willing able field workers because they're snooty. But if you want to truly change that perception, by all means go till the ground.
First off, I call bullshit. There are $20+ per hour jobs right here right now. Why would any citizen work for minimum wage in backbreaking labor? Taking 'our jobs'
Second, you are the one arguing that illegal immigrants can somehow be stopped by a combination of a modern 'iron curtain' and a militarization of the border while I am arguing that the US should use some of that money wasted on Cheney and Halliburton to improve the conditions of a directly bordering nation.
The burden is upon you, not me, to pick the fruit as you are the one who apparently despises illegal immigrants. Also I figure you would be better at it having already shown you know how to palm the pea
Killing on sight is against the law. So, no, I'm not advocating that.
Thank God
Please stifle your activism for a more applicable thread. Or by the very least, don't simply talk about leaving because you're so disenchanted with the state of affairs-- just leave and be done with it. That way all parties win.
Indeed, the old 'America, love it or leave it" argument. Let me make this simple enough for all to understand, including you. I believe in the Constitution of the United States of America and as a veteran and patriot I will defend it against all enemies both foreign and domestic. Are you in disagreement with me?
Excuse me, I have to take a hundred breaths

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by Hyroglyphx, posted 08-05-2007 5:55 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 109 by Hyroglyphx, posted 08-07-2007 5:19 PM anglagard has not replied

  
anglagard
Member (Idle past 866 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 100 of 115 (414760)
08-06-2007 2:41 AM
Reply to: Message 93 by Hyroglyphx
08-05-2007 5:55 PM


Re: Reality versus talking points
OK, I took my hundred breaths.
So, NJ, what is your solution to illegal immigration?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by Hyroglyphx, posted 08-05-2007 5:55 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024