quote:
The only thing that I would add is that it seems to me that your rejection of the supernatural is based on the premise that all phenomena does in the final analysis have a physical explanation.
Kind of. Except that the "premise" that all phenomena have a physical explanation is a
conclusion I have reached based on what I have personally observed, and on my evaluations of the conclusions and claims of others.
Except that I don't necessarily believe that
all phenomena have a physical explanation. The origin of the universe, which might also include the origin of time itself, is a concept that I have trouble even grasping in terms of the physical. I accept that the origin of the universe may not have physical explanation -- the universe may simply exist without any cause, for example. Unless we want to call "existing without cause" to be a physical explanation.
"The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one." -- George Bernard Shaw