CrashFrog vs. Juhrahnimo: A friendly discussion

yes. I'd say he answered you. completely.

you come in on my thread and walk all over it with irrelevant comments and get it closed down and expect me to have any sympathy for you?yes I would say that frog answered you and that you are incapable of taking his answer at value.I also think it is very arrogant of you in the first place to think that you can "correct" his thinking, when he has shown much clearer thought process than anything I have seen from you.want more?

and I notice that you don't apologize for your rude behavior on the other thread either.I also read on another thread where he said he didn't want to be your pet rehabilitation project.drinking? what a nice backhanded snide little insult.rude, arrogant, insulting ... what else do you have to show?certainly not any evidence.

when you grow up we can continue to discuss the reality of the world.all I have pointed out is that you started out calling me stupid and went south from there, that your posts were totally irrelevant to the topic involved, and that your specific behavior resulted in the topic being closed specifically due to lack of rational and relevance of your responses.seems to me that you are the one who cannot stand up to a real conversation without devolving into childish banter and immature behavior.seems like you are begging to be insulted, but sorry to dissappoint: I will continue to let you insult yourself.enjoy.

---

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

I doubt you'll get it. He's too busy playing the poor martyr to let reality intrude. and, as I said, childish. somehow I am in control of a whole buch of other posters? LOL. somehow I am responsible for the content of posts by others that I haven't seen? ROFLOL.leave the child alone and let him cry. that's how you deal with tantrums. I wasn't going to spend the time on him to search those down, but thanks.

ok I mixed you up with the one you were egging on with non-essential comments. mea culpa. that does not absolve you of the responsibility for the post that caused the thread to be closed.the comment I made is a paraphrase of one by Richard Dawkins, and it might increase your education to read the whole article:
Ignorance is No Crime
You might want to read the whole article to see where you fit in. You will note that I added deceived to his list, as I think it is more applicable than a blanket insane.For point of reference "insane" also includes but is not limited to deluded whether by one's own mental state or by others who have contributed to it.I put most people who continue with mistaken arguments in the category of {deceived\deluded} once they have shown that ignorance is not the issue.And for the record: I stand by the statement, with the added caveat -- if the shoe fits, wear it.Personally I don't care what your opinion is, and all this ranting is really humorous because, heh, as it appears you don't have much else to say.Certainly you couldn't contribute to the topic that is now closed.I also notice that you did not jump on CreationFan for his comment, so it would appear that you are the hypocrite on this topic.Enjoy. Really.

---

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

and?

as I expected.